The Role of Place in Social Prescribing: A State‐of‐the‐Art Literature Review

Introduction: Social prescribing seeks to connect people to community‐based resources, to improve their health and wellbeing. It is often framed as a response to health inequalities. However, the impact of place‐based differences is seldom considered. As social prescribing depends on local resources, this is a significant knowledge gap. This review aims to examine the extent to which social prescribing research to date has engaged with places and communities. Methods: This state‐of‐the‐art literature review has three components: (1) Four databases (PubMed, ASSIA, Web of Science and Scopus) were searched for social prescribing literature reviews; key characteristics were charted and a timeline created. (2) Each review was assessed for its engagement with concepts of place, and findings were synthesised narratively. (3) Exploratory searches were conducted in PubMed for primary research on place in social prescribing, and findings summarised descriptively. Results: A total of 97 eligible literature reviews were identified. A timeline of these reviews and their characteristics was created, including population, referral reasons, social prescribing model, intervention and aim. No reviews had ‘complete’ engagement with concepts of place. Thirty‐one had ‘partial’ engagement. These suggested five ways of thinking about place: place as healing, experience of societal inequalities and its effect on place, how deprivation shapes place, place as the context for social prescribing and alternative conceptions of place. We found eight primary studies addressing social prescribing and place. Six looked in detail at a particular place or characteristic of places, and two contributed theoretical understandings of the relationship between place and social prescribing. Discussion: The role of place in social prescribing remains understudied. Future research could develop theory and frameworks to account for place or identify which elements of place‐based community infrastructure are particularly relevant for social prescribing, especially as deprivation and austerity continue to diminish community resources in the areas which most need them.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health & Social Care in the Community
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1155/hsc/9920046
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Art Therapy and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
18.44

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Role of Place in Social Prescribing: A State‐of‐the‐Art Literature Review

Emilie McSwiggan, Eddie Donaghy, Stewart W Mercer, Amy Jane O'Donnell et al.
3 citations
Health & Social Care in the Community
Art Therapy and Mental Health
18.44
article

The Role of Place in Social Prescribing: A State‐of‐the‐Art Literature Review

Emilie McSwiggan, Eddie Donaghy, Stewart W Mercer, Amy Jane O'Donnell, Jackie Gulland
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Introduction: Social prescribing seeks to connect people to community‐based resources, to improve their health and wellbeing. It is often framed as a response to health inequalities. However, the impact of place‐based differences is seldom considered. As social prescribing depends on local resources, this is a significant knowledge gap. This review aims to examine the extent to which social prescribing research to date has engaged with places and communities. Methods: This state‐of‐the‐art literature review has three components: (1) Four databases (PubMed, ASSIA, Web of Science and Scopus) were searched for social prescribing literature reviews; key characteristics were charted and a timeline created. (2) Each review was assessed for its engagement with concepts of place, and findings were synthesised narratively. (3) Exploratory searches were conducted in PubMed for primary research on place in social prescribing, and findings summarised descriptively. Results: A total of 97 eligible literature reviews were identified. A timeline of these reviews and their characteristics was created, including population, referral reasons, social prescribing model, intervention and aim. No reviews had ‘complete’ engagement with concepts of place. Thirty‐one had ‘partial’ engagement. These suggested five ways of thinking about place: place as healing, experience of societal inequalities and its effect on place, how deprivation shapes place, place as the context for social prescribing and alternative conceptions of place. We found eight primary studies addressing social prescribing and place. Six looked in detail at a particular place or characteristic of places, and two contributed theoretical understandings of the relationship between place and social prescribing. Discussion: The role of place in social prescribing remains understudied. Future research could develop theory and frameworks to account for place or identify which elements of place‐based community infrastructure are particularly relevant for social prescribing, especially as deprivation and austerity continue to diminish community resources in the areas which most need them.

Health & Social Care in the CommunityVol. 2025(1)
Newcastle University (GB), University of Edinburgh (GB)
University of Edinburgh
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Art Therapy and Mental Health
18.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.