Retraction Citation Network Analysis of Iranian Computer Scientists

This study examines the retraction citation network of Iranian computer scientists, focusing on retracted publications in Computer Science, Data Science, and Electrical Engineering from 2008 to 2024. Using data from Retraction Watch and citation information from OpenAlex, we analyze 169 retracted papers to identify trends, self-citation practices, and the persistence of citations to retracted works. Key findings reveal that deliberate misconduct is the primary cause of retractions, with significant variations in retraction time lags over the years. Network analysis highlights clusters of interconnected retracted articles and identifies self-citation patterns among authors, underscoring the continued influence of flawed research. The study emphasizes the need for improved post-retraction management and research integrity policies to mitigate the impact of retracted publications on academic discourse. This work contributes to understanding retraction dynamics in a specific regional and disciplinary context, offering insights for fostering a more ethical scientific ecosystem.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icwr65219.2025.11006170
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ophthalmology and Visual Health Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.71
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Retraction Citation Network Analysis of Iranian Computer Scientists

Payam Zahedi, Sadegh Sulaimany
1 citations
Ophthalmology and Visual Health Research
1.71
article

Retraction Citation Network Analysis of Iranian Computer Scientists

Payam Zahedi, Sadegh Sulaimany
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study examines the retraction citation network of Iranian computer scientists, focusing on retracted publications in Computer Science, Data Science, and Electrical Engineering from 2008 to 2024. Using data from Retraction Watch and citation information from OpenAlex, we analyze 169 retracted papers to identify trends, self-citation practices, and the persistence of citations to retracted works. Key findings reveal that deliberate misconduct is the primary cause of retractions, with significant variations in retraction time lags over the years. Network analysis highlights clusters of interconnected retracted articles and identifies self-citation patterns among authors, underscoring the continued influence of flawed research. The study emphasizes the need for improved post-retraction management and research integrity policies to mitigate the impact of retracted publications on academic discourse. This work contributes to understanding retraction dynamics in a specific regional and disciplinary context, offering insights for fostering a more ethical scientific ecosystem.

Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Ophthalmology and Visual Health Research
1.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Retraction Citation Network Analysis of Iranian Computer Scientists — Payam Zahedi, Sadegh Sulaimany · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS