Two-Stage Clustering and Independent Competing Based Evolutionary Algorithm for Multimodal Multi-Objective Optimization

The multimodal multi-objective optimization problem (MMOP) involves multiple distinct components of the Pareto set (PS), which correspond to the same Pareto front (PF). Most existing multimodal multi-objective evolutionary algorithms (MMOEAs) face challenges in achieving both accuracy and timeliness in solving MMOPs. In this article, a two-stage clustering and independent competing based evolutionary algorithm (TSCICEA) is proposed for solving MMOPs. Firstly, in the early stage of population evolution, the K-means technique is used to coarsely cluster the population into multiple independent subpopulations, which aims to rapidly ascertain the approximate distribution structure of modalities and preliminarily locate their spatial positions. In the later stage, the DBSCAN technique is utilized to conduct fine clustering of the population, which aims to re-cluster misclustered individuals in the coarse clustering into new subpopulations, thus achieving a precise distinction between different modalities. Subsequently, to accurately identify the corresponding modality for each subpopulation, an independent competing strategy is proposed. This strategy can automatically assign different identification approaches for each modality based on their differences, and it simultaneously manages different modalities through parallel execution, thus significantly enhancing both the accuracy and timeliness of modality identification. To evaluate the effectiveness of TSCICEA, we compare it against state-of-the-art algorithms on benchmark test problems with 2–15 objectives and 4–15 variables. Experimental results demonstrate that TSCICEA achieves superior performance in terms of the IEDRX, IMST, and HV indicators

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/tevc.2025.3572757
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.51

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Two-Stage Clustering and Independent Competing Based Evolutionary Algorithm for Multimodal Multi-Objective Optimization

Keyu Zhong, Xieping Gao, Fen Xiao
3 citations
IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation
Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms
4.51
article

Two-Stage Clustering and Independent Competing Based Evolutionary Algorithm for Multimodal Multi-Objective Optimization

Keyu Zhong, Xieping Gao, Fen Xiao
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The multimodal multi-objective optimization problem (MMOP) involves multiple distinct components of the Pareto set (PS), which correspond to the same Pareto front (PF). Most existing multimodal multi-objective evolutionary algorithms (MMOEAs) face challenges in achieving both accuracy and timeliness in solving MMOPs. In this article, a two-stage clustering and independent competing based evolutionary algorithm (TSCICEA) is proposed for solving MMOPs. Firstly, in the early stage of population evolution, the K-means technique is used to coarsely cluster the population into multiple independent subpopulations, which aims to rapidly ascertain the approximate distribution structure of modalities and preliminarily locate their spatial positions. In the later stage, the DBSCAN technique is utilized to conduct fine clustering of the population, which aims to re-cluster misclustered individuals in the coarse clustering into new subpopulations, thus achieving a precise distinction between different modalities. Subsequently, to accurately identify the corresponding modality for each subpopulation, an independent competing strategy is proposed. This strategy can automatically assign different identification approaches for each modality based on their differences, and it simultaneously manages different modalities through parallel execution, thus significantly enhancing both the accuracy and timeliness of modality identification. To evaluate the effectiveness of TSCICEA, we compare it against state-of-the-art algorithms on benchmark test problems with 2–15 objectives and 4–15 variables. Experimental results demonstrate that TSCICEA achieves superior performance in terms of the IEDRX, IMST, and HV indicators

IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation
Hunan Normal University (CN), Xiangtan University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms
4.51
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.