Sensitivity driven model updating: a multi-step procedure for structural assessment

Automatic model updating, or model calibration procedures, have significantly streamlined the creation of digital twins, i.e., virtual models strongly informed by experimental data. This methodology supports real-time monitoring and predictive maintenance by ensuring the digital twin accurately reflects the physical structure. However, when the parameters to be inferred are modal parameters, such as natural frequency or mode shape, additional challenges arise. This is especially true in the case of complex monumental buildings. A key issue is ensuring the model not only predicts these parameters correctly but also in the same order as seen in Operational Modal Analysis campaigns. Discrepancies in predicted versus experimental modal parameters often indicate significant modeling errors, resulting in inversions of the predicted vibrational modes. These inversions can invalidate automatic model updating results, slowing the calibration process and leading to potentially incorrect results. Several factors can cause these mode inversions, including inaccuracies in model parameters or modeling simplifications. This work introduces a procedure to mitigate the mode inversion problem by leveraging sensitivity analysis to select the most impactful mechanical parameters and vibration modes for calibration. The proposed methodology involves initial mechanical testing to reduce parameter uncertainties, followed by sensitivity analysis to identify key parameters. Preliminary model assessment and mode matching are then conducted to establish baseline discrepancies. Sensitive parameters are adjusted to align the model more closely with experimental data, followed by a recursive calibration process. The updated model is validated and verified against Operational Modal Analysis results, ensuring correct ordering and reduced errors of modal parameters. • The methodology for automatic model updating facilitates the realization of digital twins, supporting real-time monitoring and predictive maintenance by ensuring an accurate reproduction of the physical structure. • Inversion of vibrational modes can invalidate the results of automatic model updating, complicating the calibration process and leading to significant errors in predicted modal parameters, especially in complex monumental buildings. • The proposed approach utilizes sensitivity analysis to identify the most influential mechanical parameters, allowing for more effective model calibration and a reduction of uncertainties related to mechanical behaviors. • Validating numerical models through modal updating methods is crucial to ensure that the results of structural analyses are accurate and reflect the true health state of complex structures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Building Engineering
Published
2025-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2025.112941
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.91

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sensitivity driven model updating: a multi-step procedure for structural assessment

Rosario Ceravolo, Erica Lenticchia, Gaetano Miraglia, J.P. Lopez
2 citations
Journal of Building Engineering
Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
1.91
article

Sensitivity driven model updating: a multi-step procedure for structural assessment

Rosario Ceravolo, Erica Lenticchia, Gaetano Miraglia, J.P. Lopez
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Automatic model updating, or model calibration procedures, have significantly streamlined the creation of digital twins, i.e., virtual models strongly informed by experimental data. This methodology supports real-time monitoring and predictive maintenance by ensuring the digital twin accurately reflects the physical structure. However, when the parameters to be inferred are modal parameters, such as natural frequency or mode shape, additional challenges arise. This is especially true in the case of complex monumental buildings. A key issue is ensuring the model not only predicts these parameters correctly but also in the same order as seen in Operational Modal Analysis campaigns. Discrepancies in predicted versus experimental modal parameters often indicate significant modeling errors, resulting in inversions of the predicted vibrational modes. These inversions can invalidate automatic model updating results, slowing the calibration process and leading to potentially incorrect results. Several factors can cause these mode inversions, including inaccuracies in model parameters or modeling simplifications. This work introduces a procedure to mitigate the mode inversion problem by leveraging sensitivity analysis to select the most impactful mechanical parameters and vibration modes for calibration. The proposed methodology involves initial mechanical testing to reduce parameter uncertainties, followed by sensitivity analysis to identify key parameters. Preliminary model assessment and mode matching are then conducted to establish baseline discrepancies. Sensitive parameters are adjusted to align the model more closely with experimental data, followed by a recursive calibration process. The updated model is validated and verified against Operational Modal Analysis results, ensuring correct ordering and reduced errors of modal parameters. • The methodology for automatic model updating facilitates the realization of digital twins, supporting real-time monitoring and predictive maintenance by ensuring an accurate reproduction of the physical structure. • Inversion of vibrational modes can invalidate the results of automatic model updating, complicating the calibration process and leading to significant errors in predicted modal parameters, especially in complex monumental buildings. • The proposed approach utilizes sensitivity analysis to identify the most influential mechanical parameters, allowing for more effective model calibration and a reduction of uncertainties related to mechanical behaviors. • Validating numerical models through modal updating methods is crucial to ensure that the results of structural analyses are accurate and reflect the true health state of complex structures.

Journal of Building EngineeringVol. 109
Politecnico di Torino (IT)
Getty Foundation
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
1.91
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.