Use of The Heat Treatment Method as An Alternative to Commercial Kit-Based Nucleic Acid Extraction Method for Detecting SARS-CoV-2 Using RT-qPCR Technique under Reagent Limited Conditions

The increase in the number of COVID-19 cases could cause disruptions to the global supply chain of commercial kits for the extraction of SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid so that the COVID-19 screening process has the potential to be hampered. Another alternative method that can be used is the heat-treatment (HT) method. This study aims to assess the quality of the results of the RT-qPCR examination for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 using the HT nucleic acid extraction method. The samples were nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs and then underwent nucleic acid extraction using the magnetic beads extraction (MBE) / commercial kit and the HT method on the same day (less than 6 hours). The nucleic acid extraction results from both methods were then amplified using the RT-qPCR technique, then compared and analyzed the results. The results showed that qualitatively there was a very significant difference in the interpretation of the results between the two nucleic acid extraction methods (McNemar test, p = 0; p < 0.01). Qualitative comparative analysis also showed that there were very significant differences in ct (cycle threshold) values in the SARS-CoV-2 genes detected between the two nucleic acid extraction methods (McNemar test, p = 0; p < 0.01). While the value of ct in human gene between the two methods of nucleic acid extraction qualitatively there was no significant difference (McNemar test, p = 1; p > 0.05). The use of HT method for extraction will be more effective on cells or microorganisms that have genetic material in the form of DNA than RNA. The HT method is not recommended for use in the diagnosis of COVID-19. The use of this method as a screening in moderate to severe symptomatic populations under conditions of limited extraction reagents may be considered.Keywords: SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19, Heat-Treatment Method, Nucleic Acid Extraction, RT-qPCR

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Jurnal Kesehatan Pasak Bumi Kalimantan
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30872/j.kes.pasmi.kal.v7i2.15797
Primary Topic
SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Use of The Heat Treatment Method as An Alternative to Commercial Kit-Based Nucleic Acid Extraction Method for Detecting SARS-CoV-2 Using RT-qPCR Technique under Reagent Limited Conditions

Yadi Yadi, Nataniel Tandirogang, Alhawaris Alhawaris
Jurnal Kesehatan Pasak Bumi Kalimantan
SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
article

Use of The Heat Treatment Method as An Alternative to Commercial Kit-Based Nucleic Acid Extraction Method for Detecting SARS-CoV-2 Using RT-qPCR Technique under Reagent Limited Conditions

Yadi Yadi, Nataniel Tandirogang, Alhawaris Alhawaris
article en

Abstract

The increase in the number of COVID-19 cases could cause disruptions to the global supply chain of commercial kits for the extraction of SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid so that the COVID-19 screening process has the potential to be hampered. Another alternative method that can be used is the heat-treatment (HT) method. This study aims to assess the quality of the results of the RT-qPCR examination for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 using the HT nucleic acid extraction method. The samples were nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs and then underwent nucleic acid extraction using the magnetic beads extraction (MBE) / commercial kit and the HT method on the same day (less than 6 hours). The nucleic acid extraction results from both methods were then amplified using the RT-qPCR technique, then compared and analyzed the results. The results showed that qualitatively there was a very significant difference in the interpretation of the results between the two nucleic acid extraction methods (McNemar test, p = 0; p < 0.01). Qualitative comparative analysis also showed that there were very significant differences in ct (cycle threshold) values in the SARS-CoV-2 genes detected between the two nucleic acid extraction methods (McNemar test, p = 0; p < 0.01). While the value of ct in human gene between the two methods of nucleic acid extraction qualitatively there was no significant difference (McNemar test, p = 1; p > 0.05). The use of HT method for extraction will be more effective on cells or microorganisms that have genetic material in the form of DNA than RNA. The HT method is not recommended for use in the diagnosis of COVID-19. The use of this method as a screening in moderate to severe symptomatic populations under conditions of limited extraction reagents may be considered.Keywords: SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19, Heat-Treatment Method, Nucleic Acid Extraction, RT-qPCR

Jurnal Kesehatan Pasak Bumi KalimantanVol. 7(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.