You Catch More Flies with Honey: An Examination of Techniques to Mitigate Client Reactions to Increased Professional Skepticism

SUMMARY Professional skepticism (PS) is essential to audit quality but can harm auditor-client relations. We rely on Expectancy Violations Theory (EVT) to predict that clients negatively react to higher than expected PS. We also examine whether auditors can use various impression management strategies to mitigate these detrimental outcomes. Experimental results indicate that higher than expected PS creates negative affect toward the auditor, which in turn reduces client cooperation and harms auditor-client relations. Furthermore, auditors’ use of ingratiation reduces the negative affect resulting from higher than expected PS and helps auditors maintain client cooperation (using two measures of client evidence provision) and client relations. Of particular importance, results indicate increased PS does not improve evidence collection unless the auditor actively alleviates client negative affect caused by increased PS. Thus, auditors’ use of ingratiation may improve perceptions of client service and lead to increased audit quality, rendering the application of PS more effective. Data Availability: Please contact the authors. JEL Classification: M42.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory
Published
2025-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-2022-094
Primary Topic
Communication in Education and Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

You Catch More Flies with Honey: An Examination of Techniques to Mitigate Client Reactions to Increased Professional Skepticism

Jesse C. Robertson, D. Kip Holderness, Jared Eutsler, Mary B. Curtis
Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory
Communication in Education and Healthcare
article

You Catch More Flies with Honey: An Examination of Techniques to Mitigate Client Reactions to Increased Professional Skepticism

Jesse C. Robertson, D. Kip Holderness, Jared Eutsler, Mary B. Curtis
article en

Abstract

SUMMARY Professional skepticism (PS) is essential to audit quality but can harm auditor-client relations. We rely on Expectancy Violations Theory (EVT) to predict that clients negatively react to higher than expected PS. We also examine whether auditors can use various impression management strategies to mitigate these detrimental outcomes. Experimental results indicate that higher than expected PS creates negative affect toward the auditor, which in turn reduces client cooperation and harms auditor-client relations. Furthermore, auditors’ use of ingratiation reduces the negative affect resulting from higher than expected PS and helps auditors maintain client cooperation (using two measures of client evidence provision) and client relations. Of particular importance, results indicate increased PS does not improve evidence collection unless the auditor actively alleviates client negative affect caused by increased PS. Thus, auditors’ use of ingratiation may improve perceptions of client service and lead to increased audit quality, rendering the application of PS more effective. Data Availability: Please contact the authors. JEL Classification: M42.

Auditing A Journal of Practice & TheoryVol. 45(1)
West Virginia University (US), University of North Texas (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Communication in Education and Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

You Catch More Flies with Honey: An Examination of Techniques to Mitigate Client Reactions to Increased Professional Skepticism — Jesse C. Robertson, D. Kip Holderness, et al. · Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS