Comparing Optical Variability of Type 1 and Type 2 AGN from the BAT 9 Month Sample Using ASAS-SN and TESS Surveys

Abstract We present an optical variability analysis and comparison of the samples of Seyfert 1 (Sy1) and Seyfert 2 (Sy2) galaxies, selected from the Swift 9 month BAT catalog, using the light curves from Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS) and All-Sky Automated Survey for SuperNovae (ASAS-SN). We measured the normalized excess variance of TESS and ASAS-SN light curves for each target and performed a Kolmogorov–Smirnov test between the two samples, where our results showed significant differences. This is consistent with predictions from the unification model, where Seyfert 2s are obscured by the larger scale dust torus and their variability is suppressed. This variability difference is independent of the luminosity, Eddington ratio, or black hole mass, further supporting geometrical unification models. We searched the dependence of the normalized excess variance of Sy1s on absolute magnitudes, Eddington ratio, and black hole mass, where our results are consistent with relations found in the literature. Finally, a small subsample of changing-look (CL) active galactic nuclei (AGNs) that transitioned during the time frame of the ASAS-SN light curves, with their variability amplitudes changing according to the classification, have larger variability as type 1s and smaller as 2s. The change of variability amplitudes can be used to better pinpoint when the type transition occurred. The consistency trend of the variability amplitude differences between Sy1s and Sy2s and between CL AGNs in 1 or 2 stages suggests that variability can be a key factor in shedding light on the CL AGN or the dichotomy between Sy1 or Sy2 populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2025-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/adcb40
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.31

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing Optical Variability of Type 1 and Type 2 AGN from the BAT 9 Month Sample Using ASAS-SN and TESS Surveys

Natalie Kovacevic, Heechan Yuk, B. J. Shappee, Xinyu Dai et al.
2 citations
The Astrophysical Journal
Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
2.31
article

Comparing Optical Variability of Type 1 and Type 2 AGN from the BAT 9 Month Sample Using ASAS-SN and TESS Surveys

Natalie Kovacevic, Heechan Yuk, B. J. Shappee, Xinyu Dai, Francesco Shankar, P. Vallely, E. Järvelä, K. Z. Stanek, Ting-Feng Yi
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract We present an optical variability analysis and comparison of the samples of Seyfert 1 (Sy1) and Seyfert 2 (Sy2) galaxies, selected from the Swift 9 month BAT catalog, using the light curves from Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS) and All-Sky Automated Survey for SuperNovae (ASAS-SN). We measured the normalized excess variance of TESS and ASAS-SN light curves for each target and performed a Kolmogorov–Smirnov test between the two samples, where our results showed significant differences. This is consistent with predictions from the unification model, where Seyfert 2s are obscured by the larger scale dust torus and their variability is suppressed. This variability difference is independent of the luminosity, Eddington ratio, or black hole mass, further supporting geometrical unification models. We searched the dependence of the normalized excess variance of Sy1s on absolute magnitudes, Eddington ratio, and black hole mass, where our results are consistent with relations found in the literature. Finally, a small subsample of changing-look (CL) active galactic nuclei (AGNs) that transitioned during the time frame of the ASAS-SN light curves, with their variability amplitudes changing according to the classification, have larger variability as type 1s and smaller as 2s. The change of variability amplitudes can be used to better pinpoint when the type transition occurred. The consistency trend of the variability amplitude differences between Sy1s and Sy2s and between CL AGNs in 1 or 2 stages suggests that variability can be a key factor in shedding light on the CL AGN or the dichotomy between Sy1 or Sy2 populations.

The Astrophysical JournalVol. 985(2)
University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US), Yunnan Normal University (CN), Texas Tech University (US), University of Hawaii System (US), University of Southampton (GB), The Ohio State University (US), University of Oklahoma (US)
National Science Foundation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, Nuclear Safety and Security Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
2.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.