Efficacy and Safety of a Non-Carbohydrate Counting Meal Bolus Strategy in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes Using Open-Source Automated Insulin Delivery

<b><i>Aims:</i></b> This study addressed the challenge of postprandial glycemic variability in type 1 diabetes (T1D), even with AID (automated insulin delivery). We evaluated the effectiveness of a non-carbohydrate counting (non-CC) meal bolus strategy in adults with T1D utilizing open-source AID. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A total of 32 adults with T1D, aged 18 to 50 years, participated in a randomized crossover trial utilizing open-source AID. Following a 7-day run-in period, participants were randomly assigned to one of two groups: automatic mode (closed loop) or manual mode (open loop). After 2 weeks, the participants underwent a crossover to the alternate treatment mode. Prandial boluses were administered according to a sliding scale based on preprandial glucose levels, without utilizing either the exact carbohydrate content of meals or meal announcement buttons. The study compared the differences in time in range (TIR) and insulin dosage across the different phases. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Compared with the open-loop phase, the TIR for patients during the closed-loop phase increased significantly during the night (75.45% ± 12.08% vs. 83.05% ± 7.20%, <i>P</i> < 0.001) and 24 h (73.40% ± 9.98% vs. 79.21% ± 4.84%, <i>P</i> = 0.019), with a more pronounced effect observed at night. During the closed-loop phase, the frequency of 24-h hypoglycemic events (<3.9 mmol/L) was reduced compared with the open-loop phase, with no difference in nocturnal hypoglycemic events. In addition, compared with the open-loop phase, there were no significant differences in average postprandial blood glucose and peak blood glucose levels during the closed-loop phase; however, the time to reach peak postprandial blood glucose was delayed (86.06 ± 20.80 min vs. 99.08 ± 15.05 min, <i>P</i> < 0.001). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> A non-CC meal bolus strategy based on preprandial glucose in adults with T1D utilizing open-source AID effectively prevents glycemic excursions and maintains a mean TIR over 70%.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics
Published
2025-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2024.0591
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Diabetes Management and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.59
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficacy and Safety of a Non-Carbohydrate Counting Meal Bolus Strategy in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes Using Open-Source Automated Insulin Delivery

Heng Su, Qiongli Neng, Yunying Cai, Lun Zhang et al.
2 citations
Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics
Diabetes Management and Research
2.59
article

Efficacy and Safety of a Non-Carbohydrate Counting Meal Bolus Strategy in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes Using Open-Source Automated Insulin Delivery

Heng Su, Qiongli Neng, Yunying Cai, Lun Zhang, Le Ma
article en
2 citations

Abstract

<b><i>Aims:</i></b> This study addressed the challenge of postprandial glycemic variability in type 1 diabetes (T1D), even with AID (automated insulin delivery). We evaluated the effectiveness of a non-carbohydrate counting (non-CC) meal bolus strategy in adults with T1D utilizing open-source AID. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A total of 32 adults with T1D, aged 18 to 50 years, participated in a randomized crossover trial utilizing open-source AID. Following a 7-day run-in period, participants were randomly assigned to one of two groups: automatic mode (closed loop) or manual mode (open loop). After 2 weeks, the participants underwent a crossover to the alternate treatment mode. Prandial boluses were administered according to a sliding scale based on preprandial glucose levels, without utilizing either the exact carbohydrate content of meals or meal announcement buttons. The study compared the differences in time in range (TIR) and insulin dosage across the different phases. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Compared with the open-loop phase, the TIR for patients during the closed-loop phase increased significantly during the night (75.45% ± 12.08% vs. 83.05% ± 7.20%, <i>P</i> < 0.001) and 24 h (73.40% ± 9.98% vs. 79.21% ± 4.84%, <i>P</i> = 0.019), with a more pronounced effect observed at night. During the closed-loop phase, the frequency of 24-h hypoglycemic events (<3.9 mmol/L) was reduced compared with the open-loop phase, with no difference in nocturnal hypoglycemic events. In addition, compared with the open-loop phase, there were no significant differences in average postprandial blood glucose and peak blood glucose levels during the closed-loop phase; however, the time to reach peak postprandial blood glucose was delayed (86.06 ± 20.80 min vs. 99.08 ± 15.05 min, <i>P</i> < 0.001). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> A non-CC meal bolus strategy based on preprandial glucose in adults with T1D utilizing open-source AID effectively prevents glycemic excursions and maintains a mean TIR over 70%.

Diabetes Technology & TherapeuticsVol. 27(10)
Kunming University of Science and Technology (CN), Kunming Medical University (CN), First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province (CN), The First Hospital of Kunming (CN), First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University (CN)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Diabetes Management and Research
2.59
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.