Evaluating Factors Affecting the Perception of Multi-Sensory Vibration and Skin-Squeeze Cues During Voluntary Movement

Haptic wearables are capable of increasing realism in VR/AR, enabling an additional stream of information in robotic teleoperation, and augmenting feedback for motor learning. However, it is not clear how the perceptual capacity of end-users may be affected by real-world scenarios. Specifically, we hypothesized that perception of multi-sensory cues would be less accurate when the cues were presented during voluntary movement as opposed to cues presented at rest. We also believed that differences in haptic perception might be overcome with data-driven models of user perception. In this study, participants respond to a multi-sensory haptic cue indicating the direction and speed with vibration and skin squeeze, respectively. The accuracy of this response was evaluated at rest and during voluntary motion. The experimental results demonstrate that voluntary motion does not have a significant impact on the perception accuracy of haptic cues. Perception models were fit to the participant responses and compared using absolute decoding error. The results of the model analysis shows that data-driven models could be used to provide improved haptic feedback across users.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Haptics
Published
2025-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/toh.2025.3572862
Primary Topic
Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating Factors Affecting the Perception of Multi-Sensory Vibration and Skin-Squeeze Cues During Voluntary Movement

Zachary Logan, Quinn Deitrick, Katie Fitzsimons
IEEE Transactions on Haptics
Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
article

Evaluating Factors Affecting the Perception of Multi-Sensory Vibration and Skin-Squeeze Cues During Voluntary Movement

Zachary Logan, Quinn Deitrick, Katie Fitzsimons
article en

Abstract

Haptic wearables are capable of increasing realism in VR/AR, enabling an additional stream of information in robotic teleoperation, and augmenting feedback for motor learning. However, it is not clear how the perceptual capacity of end-users may be affected by real-world scenarios. Specifically, we hypothesized that perception of multi-sensory cues would be less accurate when the cues were presented during voluntary movement as opposed to cues presented at rest. We also believed that differences in haptic perception might be overcome with data-driven models of user perception. In this study, participants respond to a multi-sensory haptic cue indicating the direction and speed with vibration and skin squeeze, respectively. The accuracy of this response was evaluated at rest and during voluntary motion. The experimental results demonstrate that voluntary motion does not have a significant impact on the perception accuracy of haptic cues. Perception models were fit to the participant responses and compared using absolute decoding error. The results of the model analysis shows that data-driven models could be used to provide improved haptic feedback across users.

IEEE Transactions on HapticsVol. 18(3)
Pennsylvania State University (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluating Factors Affecting the Perception of Multi-Sensory Vibration and Skin-Squeeze Cues During Voluntary Movement — Zachary Logan, Quinn Deitrick, et al. · IEEE Transactions on Haptics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS