Valuing the cultural services of a forest protected area in Southwestern China: The roles of online deliberation and sample selection

Deliberation – the process of group discussion and consideration – has been increasingly integrated to valuation of ecosystem services. In an online stated preference survey on the Fanjing Mountain National Nature Reserve in the Southwestern China, we assessed participants' willingness to pay (WTP) for cultural services (non-material benefits gained through interacting with nature, including its ecological and geological elements and characteristics) before and after deliberation. However, among the initial participants, only a subset completed deliberation and the full survey. This dropout of participants may occur in any deliberation-based valuation survey, introducing sample selection bias for estimating the impacts of deliberation. To control sample selection bias, we applied the Heckman correction approach which uses the probability of a given observation being included in the sample based on its other observed characteristics. Overall, deliberation led to a more concentrated distribution of WTP and reduced the effects of sociodemographic drivers of WTP. Deliberation also had varied impacts on different participants' WTP, including increases, decreases, and no change. The median WTP remained unchanged, although the mean WTP became significantly lower after deliberation (even when controlling for sample selection bias that significantly influenced the effects of deliberation). The use value of the Reserve's cultural services for visitors was estimated at approximately 520 million CNY per year based on the pre-deliberation mean WTP, and 314 million CNY based on the post-deliberation mean WTP. This value reflects the Reserve's natural, cultural, and economic significance and the need for continued support for both nature conservation and sustainable tourism management. • The value of cultural services is subject to people's understanding of nature. • Deliberation impacted people's knowledge and willingness to pay (WTP) for cultural services. • We proposed a methodology to correct sample selection bias caused by participant dropout. • Sample selection significantly biased deliberation's impact on WTP. • Deliberation affected individual WTP differently but led to convergence in overall WTP.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Forest Policy and Economics
Published
2025-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2025.103526
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Economic and Environmental Valuation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.13

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Valuing the cultural services of a forest protected area in Southwestern China: The roles of online deliberation and sample selection

Matthew R. Sloggy, Ida Kubiszewski, Tong Zhang, Robert Costanza et al.
1 citations
Forest Policy and Economics
Economic and Environmental Valuation
3.13
article

Valuing the cultural services of a forest protected area in Southwestern China: The roles of online deliberation and sample selection

Matthew R. Sloggy, Ida Kubiszewski, Tong Zhang, Robert Costanza, Haojie Chen, Luhua Wu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Deliberation – the process of group discussion and consideration – has been increasingly integrated to valuation of ecosystem services. In an online stated preference survey on the Fanjing Mountain National Nature Reserve in the Southwestern China, we assessed participants' willingness to pay (WTP) for cultural services (non-material benefits gained through interacting with nature, including its ecological and geological elements and characteristics) before and after deliberation. However, among the initial participants, only a subset completed deliberation and the full survey. This dropout of participants may occur in any deliberation-based valuation survey, introducing sample selection bias for estimating the impacts of deliberation. To control sample selection bias, we applied the Heckman correction approach which uses the probability of a given observation being included in the sample based on its other observed characteristics. Overall, deliberation led to a more concentrated distribution of WTP and reduced the effects of sociodemographic drivers of WTP. Deliberation also had varied impacts on different participants' WTP, including increases, decreases, and no change. The median WTP remained unchanged, although the mean WTP became significantly lower after deliberation (even when controlling for sample selection bias that significantly influenced the effects of deliberation). The use value of the Reserve's cultural services for visitors was estimated at approximately 520 million CNY per year based on the pre-deliberation mean WTP, and 314 million CNY based on the post-deliberation mean WTP. This value reflects the Reserve's natural, cultural, and economic significance and the need for continued support for both nature conservation and sustainable tourism management. • The value of cultural services is subject to people's understanding of nature. • Deliberation impacted people's knowledge and willingness to pay (WTP) for cultural services. • We proposed a methodology to correct sample selection bias caused by participant dropout. • Sample selection significantly biased deliberation's impact on WTP. • Deliberation affected individual WTP differently but led to convergence in overall WTP.

Forest Policy and EconomicsVol. 177
Australian National University (AU), Beijing Institute of Technology (CN), United States Department of Energy (US), Tongren University (CN), Pacific Southwest Research Station (US), University College London (GB)
U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, U.S. Forest Service
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Economic and Environmental Valuation
3.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.