Validation and comparison of three different methods for automated identification of distal femoral landmarks in 3D
All fully automated methods show potential for use, depending on the use case. Characteristics of the different methods, such as the input data required (raw CT/segmented bone surface models, amount of training data required) and/or the methods robustness, can be used for method selection in the individual application.
Authors
- Masashi Okamoto (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6953-2430)
- Klaus Radermacher (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4395-3197)
- Peter Brößner (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3566-5219)
- Kunihiko Tokunaga (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0007-1000-4223)
- Luisa Berger (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0000-1490-2521)
- Sonja Ehreiser (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6366-4320)
Institutions
- Kameda Medical Center (JP)
- RWTH Aachen University (DE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Biomedizinische Technik/Biomedical Engineering
- Published
- 2025-05-22
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1515/bmt-2025-0026
- Primary Topic
- Hip disorders and treatments
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00