Research practice and culture in European universities’ Language Centres. Results of a survey in CercleS member institutions

Abstract This paper presents the findings of a survey on research activities and research cultures across the CercleS network. The survey was conducted under the auspices of the CercleS Focus Group on Leadership and Management and aimed to explore the scope of research in Language Centres; the links between institutional factors such as staff contracts and research; the areas of research undertaken and possible priorities; barriers preventing research; and attitudes to research. The survey was distributed online and contained closed and open questions, allowing for a combination of quantitative and qualitative data analyses. The total results of the 99 out of 401 member institutions were compared with the responses from the five most represented national associations to identify any notable differences in the results between different national associations. The full data revealed a wide range of institutional situations but showed fairly similar results among the five most represented national associations. 72 % of respondents indicated that they engage in some form of research activity. However, 27 % of respondents stated that they do not engage in research, yet a majority of those still promote or offer research-oriented activities. Most responses confirmed the valuable contribution research makes to the professionalisation of learning, teaching, and staff development and therefore Language Centres’ quality development. This is more effective when individual research activities are aligned with the remit of the Language Centre. Furthermore, a research-supportive culture can and does exist in a good number of cases, despite challenging institutional factors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Language Learning in Higher Education
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/cercles-2024-0091
Primary Topic
Second Language Learning and Teaching
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Research practice and culture in European universities’ Language Centres. Results of a survey in CercleS member institutions

Mark Critchley, Sabina Schaffner, Irmgard Wanner
Language Learning in Higher Education
Second Language Learning and Teaching
article

Research practice and culture in European universities’ Language Centres. Results of a survey in CercleS member institutions

Mark Critchley, Sabina Schaffner, Irmgard Wanner
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper presents the findings of a survey on research activities and research cultures across the CercleS network. The survey was conducted under the auspices of the CercleS Focus Group on Leadership and Management and aimed to explore the scope of research in Language Centres; the links between institutional factors such as staff contracts and research; the areas of research undertaken and possible priorities; barriers preventing research; and attitudes to research. The survey was distributed online and contained closed and open questions, allowing for a combination of quantitative and qualitative data analyses. The total results of the 99 out of 401 member institutions were compared with the responses from the five most represented national associations to identify any notable differences in the results between different national associations. The full data revealed a wide range of institutional situations but showed fairly similar results among the five most represented national associations. 72 % of respondents indicated that they engage in some form of research activity. However, 27 % of respondents stated that they do not engage in research, yet a majority of those still promote or offer research-oriented activities. Most responses confirmed the valuable contribution research makes to the professionalisation of learning, teaching, and staff development and therefore Language Centres’ quality development. This is more effective when individual research activities are aligned with the remit of the Language Centre. Furthermore, a research-supportive culture can and does exist in a good number of cases, despite challenging institutional factors.

Language Learning in Higher EducationVol. 15(1)
Durham University (GB), University of Zurich (CH), Leipzig University (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Second Language Learning and Teaching
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.