Challenges of open frontal sinus surgery

Over the past century, frontal sinus surgery has undergone substantial transformation, with advances in imaging, optics, and instrumentation contributing to current treatment paradigms. This review article is devoted to the evolution of surgical methods for treating frontal sinus diseases, demonstrates the complexity of surgical access, anatomical features, and the high rate of postoperative complications in this area. The historical development of frontal sinus surgery is outlined, from ancient trepanation practices, first thoroughly described in the 18th century, to modern minimally invasive endoscopic techniques. Particular attention is given to the transition from radical external approaches, such as the Ogston–Luc procedure, radical ablation, and complete sinus obliteration, to more conservative procedures aimed at preserving anatomical integrity and frontal sinus function. The review includes an analysis of early surgical milestones by Ogston, Kuhnt, Riedel-Schenke, and Killian, and examines the evolution of external frontoethmoidectomies known as Lynch–Howarth procedures. The limitations of these techniques, including high restenosis rates, scarring, and cosmetic deformities, are discussed, along with the development of various modifications intended to improve drainage and reduce postoperative complications. The article also addresses the challenges of intranasal approaches, such as limited visualization and the risk of intracranial complications. Advances in osteoplastic techniques are reviewed, noting their high efficacy alongside technical difficulty and risks such as cerebrospinal fluid leak and neuralgia. Despite the rise of endoscopic methods, external approaches remain relevant for certain specialists due to the unique anatomy of the frontal sinus, limited surgical experience, or complex disease course, either as stand-alone options or part of combined strategies. The review demonstrates that optimizing surgical treatment of the frontal sinus remains a relevant challenge, requiring continuous refinement of techniques and an individualized approach to each patient.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Folia Otorhinolaryngologiae et Pathologiae Respiratoriae
Published
2024-12-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17816/fopr642271
Primary Topic
Sinusitis and nasal conditions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Challenges of open frontal sinus surgery

M. V. Nersesyan, V. I. Popadyuk, G. A. Polev, Valeria V. Muntean
Folia Otorhinolaryngologiae et Pathologiae Respiratoriae
Sinusitis and nasal conditions
article

Challenges of open frontal sinus surgery

M. V. Nersesyan, V. I. Popadyuk, G. A. Polev, Valeria V. Muntean
article en

Abstract

Over the past century, frontal sinus surgery has undergone substantial transformation, with advances in imaging, optics, and instrumentation contributing to current treatment paradigms. This review article is devoted to the evolution of surgical methods for treating frontal sinus diseases, demonstrates the complexity of surgical access, anatomical features, and the high rate of postoperative complications in this area. The historical development of frontal sinus surgery is outlined, from ancient trepanation practices, first thoroughly described in the 18th century, to modern minimally invasive endoscopic techniques. Particular attention is given to the transition from radical external approaches, such as the Ogston–Luc procedure, radical ablation, and complete sinus obliteration, to more conservative procedures aimed at preserving anatomical integrity and frontal sinus function. The review includes an analysis of early surgical milestones by Ogston, Kuhnt, Riedel-Schenke, and Killian, and examines the evolution of external frontoethmoidectomies known as Lynch–Howarth procedures. The limitations of these techniques, including high restenosis rates, scarring, and cosmetic deformities, are discussed, along with the development of various modifications intended to improve drainage and reduce postoperative complications. The article also addresses the challenges of intranasal approaches, such as limited visualization and the risk of intracranial complications. Advances in osteoplastic techniques are reviewed, noting their high efficacy alongside technical difficulty and risks such as cerebrospinal fluid leak and neuralgia. Despite the rise of endoscopic methods, external approaches remain relevant for certain specialists due to the unique anatomy of the frontal sinus, limited surgical experience, or complex disease course, either as stand-alone options or part of combined strategies. The review demonstrates that optimizing surgical treatment of the frontal sinus remains a relevant challenge, requiring continuous refinement of techniques and an individualized approach to each patient.

Folia Otorhinolaryngologiae et Pathologiae RespiratoriaeVol. 30(4)
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Sinusitis and nasal conditions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.