The Concept of Humorous Irony: Jorge Portilla, Carlos Alberto Sánchez, Richard Rorty, Jonathan Lear, and Socrates, with Minimal Reference to Kierkegaard

Abstract Jorge Portilla, in his Fenomenolog ía del Relajo , translated by Carlos Alberto Sánchez, argues that there is a specter haunting Mexican society in the mid-Twentieth Century: the “suspension of seriousness” through the value-denying, community-destroying, bad-faith having, truth-apathetic, laughing-at-everything relajo. Sánchez’s insightful investigation of Portilla’s text leaves “relajo” untranslated, but offers several explanations for the term, arguing that such a phenomenon is not unique to Mexico, nor to the mid-Twentieth Century. It is a universal concern that is pressing today, at least for those interested in value, community, authenticity, and truth. For those not interested, well they can go fuck themselves! HA! Now, if I repeated such frivolity and my value-apathetic jocularity spread like a contagion to others, wholly undermining the seriousness embedded in this earnest philosophical investigation into relajo , well, then I might be engaged in something akin to relajo. Portilla suggests an ironic attitude as a means for transcending relajo , the mind-set that is absolutely disinterested in any value, often expressed in repetitive, contagious, and disruptive laughter that undermines personal responsibility and the possibility of genuine community that would otherwise seek truth and solidarity. Indeed, it is an “undiagnosed crisis,” but one that can be raised to consciousness via a properly constituted ironic stance. But, what sort of irony, and could such an ironic attitude suffice for Portilla’s values? What role might humor play in attaining and sustaining value, community, authenticity, freedom, and truth? Can a humorous-ironic attitude be an antidote against the disease of absolute apathy and permanent suspension of seriousness on the one hand, and the absolute dogmatic spirit of seriousness , what Portilla calls the apretado , on the other?

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Philosophy of Humor Yearbook
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/phhumyb-2025-0005
Primary Topic
Borges, Kipling, and Jewish Identity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Concept of Humorous Irony: Jorge Portilla, Carlos Alberto Sánchez, Richard Rorty, Jonathan Lear, and Socrates, with Minimal Reference to Kierkegaard

Chris Kramer
The Philosophy of Humor Yearbook
Borges, Kipling, and Jewish Identity
article

The Concept of Humorous Irony: Jorge Portilla, Carlos Alberto Sánchez, Richard Rorty, Jonathan Lear, and Socrates, with Minimal Reference to Kierkegaard

Chris Kramer
article en

Abstract

Abstract Jorge Portilla, in his Fenomenolog ía del Relajo , translated by Carlos Alberto Sánchez, argues that there is a specter haunting Mexican society in the mid-Twentieth Century: the “suspension of seriousness” through the value-denying, community-destroying, bad-faith having, truth-apathetic, laughing-at-everything relajo. Sánchez’s insightful investigation of Portilla’s text leaves “relajo” untranslated, but offers several explanations for the term, arguing that such a phenomenon is not unique to Mexico, nor to the mid-Twentieth Century. It is a universal concern that is pressing today, at least for those interested in value, community, authenticity, and truth. For those not interested, well they can go fuck themselves! HA! Now, if I repeated such frivolity and my value-apathetic jocularity spread like a contagion to others, wholly undermining the seriousness embedded in this earnest philosophical investigation into relajo , well, then I might be engaged in something akin to relajo. Portilla suggests an ironic attitude as a means for transcending relajo , the mind-set that is absolutely disinterested in any value, often expressed in repetitive, contagious, and disruptive laughter that undermines personal responsibility and the possibility of genuine community that would otherwise seek truth and solidarity. Indeed, it is an “undiagnosed crisis,” but one that can be raised to consciousness via a properly constituted ironic stance. But, what sort of irony, and could such an ironic attitude suffice for Portilla’s values? What role might humor play in attaining and sustaining value, community, authenticity, freedom, and truth? Can a humorous-ironic attitude be an antidote against the disease of absolute apathy and permanent suspension of seriousness on the one hand, and the absolute dogmatic spirit of seriousness , what Portilla calls the apretado , on the other?

The Philosophy of Humor YearbookVol. 6(1)
Santa Barbara City College (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Borges, Kipling, and Jewish Identity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Concept of Humorous Irony: Jorge Portilla, Carlos Alberto Sánchez, Richard Rorty, Jonathan Lear, and Socrates, with Minimal Reference to Kierkegaard — Chris Kramer · The Philosophy of Humor Yearbook (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS