Longitudinal effects of visualizing uncertainty of situation detection and prediction of automated vehicles on user perceptions

This paper explores the impact of uncertainty visualizations in automated vehicle (AV) functionality on user perceptions over a three-day longitudinal study. Participants (N=50) watched real-world driving videos twice daily, in the morning and evening. These videos depicted morning and evening commutes, featuring visualizations of AVs' pedestrian detection, vehicle recognition, and pedestrian intention prediction. We measured perceived safety, trust, mental workload, and cognitive load using a within-subjects design. Results show increased perceived safety and trust over time, with higher ratings in the evening sessions, reflecting greater predictability and user confidence in AV by the study's end. However, inconsistencies in pedestrian detection and intention prediction led to mixed reactions, highlighting the need for visualization stability and clarity refinement. Participants also desired a feature indicating the AV's intended path and options for manual intervention. Our findings suggest transparency and usability in AV visualizations can foster trust and perceived safety, informing future AV interface design. • Computer vision models visualized automated vehicles' detection, prediction, and planning. • Longitudinal study investigating the impact of visualized uncertainties. • Three morning and evening sessions regarding user trust, perceived safety, and cognitive load. • Trust and perceived safety increased over time, evening higher than morning. • Mixed reactions to inconsistencies in pedestrian detection and intention prediction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour
Published
2025-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2025.05.013
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Longitudinal effects of visualizing uncertainty of situation detection and prediction of automated vehicles on user perceptions

Mark Colley, Pascal Jansen, Max Rädler, Enrico Rukzio et al.
1 citations
Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
2.44
article

Longitudinal effects of visualizing uncertainty of situation detection and prediction of automated vehicles on user perceptions

Mark Colley, Pascal Jansen, Max Rädler, Enrico Rukzio, Jonas Schwedler
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This paper explores the impact of uncertainty visualizations in automated vehicle (AV) functionality on user perceptions over a three-day longitudinal study. Participants (N=50) watched real-world driving videos twice daily, in the morning and evening. These videos depicted morning and evening commutes, featuring visualizations of AVs' pedestrian detection, vehicle recognition, and pedestrian intention prediction. We measured perceived safety, trust, mental workload, and cognitive load using a within-subjects design. Results show increased perceived safety and trust over time, with higher ratings in the evening sessions, reflecting greater predictability and user confidence in AV by the study's end. However, inconsistencies in pedestrian detection and intention prediction led to mixed reactions, highlighting the need for visualization stability and clarity refinement. Participants also desired a feature indicating the AV's intended path and options for manual intervention. Our findings suggest transparency and usability in AV visualizations can foster trust and perceived safety, informing future AV interface design. • Computer vision models visualized automated vehicles' detection, prediction, and planning. • Longitudinal study investigating the impact of visualized uncertainties. • Three morning and evening sessions regarding user trust, perceived safety, and cognitive load. • Trust and perceived safety increased over time, evening higher than morning. • Mixed reactions to inconsistencies in pedestrian detection and intention prediction.

Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and BehaviourVol. 113
Universität Ulm (DE), London Centre for Nanotechnology (GB), University College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
2.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.