Fair Choices During COVID-19: Firms’ Altruism and Inequality Aversion in Managing a Large Short-Time Work Scheme

Abstract Leveraging a unique dataset encompassing choices made by the entire universe of Italian manufacturing firms regarding a short-time work scheme (STW), we investigate the impact of the pandemic’s relative local severity on firms’ altruistic tendencies and preferences towards inequality. We use the decision to advance income support payments to workers as a measure of firm altruism and the choice concerning the concentration of STW working hours among the workforce as a gauge of inequality preferences. Adopting a natural experiment-like approach, we find that, controlling for regional and industry fixed effects, in areas more severely hit by the pandemic firms were more likely to advance the STW payment to their employees and to opt for a lower STW concentration. The effects we find are larger for firms characterized by more intense ties between entrepreneurs and workers, suggesting that the pandemic has mainly enhanced parochial pro-social behaviour.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The B E Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy
Published
2025-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/bejeap-2024-0369
Primary Topic
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fair Choices During COVID-19: Firms’ Altruism and Inequality Aversion in Managing a Large Short-Time Work Scheme

Maria De Paola, Paolo Naticchioni, Paola Biasi
The B E Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
article

Fair Choices During COVID-19: Firms’ Altruism and Inequality Aversion in Managing a Large Short-Time Work Scheme

Maria De Paola, Paolo Naticchioni, Paola Biasi
article en

Abstract

Abstract Leveraging a unique dataset encompassing choices made by the entire universe of Italian manufacturing firms regarding a short-time work scheme (STW), we investigate the impact of the pandemic’s relative local severity on firms’ altruistic tendencies and preferences towards inequality. We use the decision to advance income support payments to workers as a measure of firm altruism and the choice concerning the concentration of STW working hours among the workforce as a gauge of inequality preferences. Adopting a natural experiment-like approach, we find that, controlling for regional and industry fixed effects, in areas more severely hit by the pandemic firms were more likely to advance the STW payment to their employees and to opt for a lower STW concentration. The effects we find are larger for firms characterized by more intense ties between entrepreneurs and workers, suggesting that the pandemic has mainly enhanced parochial pro-social behaviour.

The B E Journal of Economic Analysis & PolicyVol. 25(3)
Roma Tre University (IT), IZA - Institute of Labor Economics (DE), Istituto Nazionale della Previdenza Sociale (IT), University of Calabria (IT)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Fair Choices During COVID-19: Firms’ Altruism and Inequality Aversion in Managing a Large Short-Time Work Scheme — Maria De Paola, Paolo Naticchioni, et al. · The B E Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS