Benchmarking AI chatbots: assessing their accuracy in identifying hijacked medical journals

Current AI chatbots are not yet reliable for detecting hijacked journals and may inadvertently promote them.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnosis
Published
2025-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2025-0043
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.31
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Benchmarking AI chatbots: assessing their accuracy in identifying hijacked medical journals

Lóránt Dénes Dávid, Mihály Hegedűs, Mehdi Dadkhah
2 citations
Diagnosis
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
1.31
article

Benchmarking AI chatbots: assessing their accuracy in identifying hijacked medical journals

Lóránt Dénes Dávid, Mihály Hegedűs, Mehdi Dadkhah
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Current AI chatbots are not yet reliable for detecting hijacked journals and may inadvertently promote them.

DiagnosisVol. 13(1)
Eötvös Loránd University (HU), Magyar Agrár- és Élettudományi Egyetem (HU), John von Neumann University (HU), Tomori Pál College (HU), Széchenyi István University (HU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
1.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.