Agronomic performance and profitability of maize and cowpea intercropping as affected by increased rows of cowpea in Ethiopia

Abstract This study assessed the effects of row arrangement and cropping systems on maize ( Zea mays L.) agronomy and profitability in a maize–cowpea ( Vigna unguiculata L.) intercropping system under field conditions in Ethiopia. A factorial combination of two cowpea varieties, TVU and White Wonder Trailing (WWT), a three‐row arrangement (1 maize [M]: 1 cowpea [C], 1 M: 2C, and 1 M: 3C), and three cropping systems (sole maize, maize+WWT, and maize+TVU) were evaluated using a randomized complete block design with three replications. The results revealed that row arrangement significantly ( p < 0.05) affected seeds cob −1 and harvest index, with the TVU variety yielding the highest values. The 1 M: 2C arrangement with the TVU variety produced the highest harvest index value, grain, and biological yields. Overall, the traits assessed were more evident in solo cropping than in intercropping. The land equivalent ratio (LER) and area time equivalent ratio (ATER) for intercropping surpassed critical thresholds in all cases. The TVU variety achieved the highest LER and ATER in the 1 M: 2C arrangement. Additionally, the 1 M: 2C+TVU combination yielded a monetary advantage index score of $2017.35 ha −1 , a net benefit of $3614.22 ha −1 , and an acceptable marginal rate of return. Therefore, it is recommended that the TVU variety be grown in a 1 M: 2C arrangement for the study areas and similar agroecological conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Crop Forage & Turfgrass Management
Published
2025-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cft2.70047
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.81
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Agronomic performance and profitability of maize and cowpea intercropping as affected by increased rows of cowpea in Ethiopia

Tewodros Ayalew, Tarekegn Yoseph, Ehtemariam Teklemariam
2 citations
Crop Forage & Turfgrass Management
Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
3.81
article

Agronomic performance and profitability of maize and cowpea intercropping as affected by increased rows of cowpea in Ethiopia

Tewodros Ayalew, Tarekegn Yoseph, Ehtemariam Teklemariam
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract This study assessed the effects of row arrangement and cropping systems on maize ( Zea mays L.) agronomy and profitability in a maize–cowpea ( Vigna unguiculata L.) intercropping system under field conditions in Ethiopia. A factorial combination of two cowpea varieties, TVU and White Wonder Trailing (WWT), a three‐row arrangement (1 maize [M]: 1 cowpea [C], 1 M: 2C, and 1 M: 3C), and three cropping systems (sole maize, maize+WWT, and maize+TVU) were evaluated using a randomized complete block design with three replications. The results revealed that row arrangement significantly ( p < 0.05) affected seeds cob −1 and harvest index, with the TVU variety yielding the highest values. The 1 M: 2C arrangement with the TVU variety produced the highest harvest index value, grain, and biological yields. Overall, the traits assessed were more evident in solo cropping than in intercropping. The land equivalent ratio (LER) and area time equivalent ratio (ATER) for intercropping surpassed critical thresholds in all cases. The TVU variety achieved the highest LER and ATER in the 1 M: 2C arrangement. Additionally, the 1 M: 2C+TVU combination yielded a monetary advantage index score of $2017.35 ha −1 , a net benefit of $3614.22 ha −1 , and an acceptable marginal rate of return. Therefore, it is recommended that the TVU variety be grown in a 1 M: 2C arrangement for the study areas and similar agroecological conditions.

Crop Forage & Turfgrass ManagementVol. 11(1)
Hawassa University (ET)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
3.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.