The Leper and Gethsemane: Will and Power in Matthean Narratives of Prayer and Providence

Abstract Jesus’s healing of the leper in Matt 8:2 and his prayers in Gethsemane in Matt 26:39, 42, 44 both involve a dialectical interplay of language of will and power, in the one case with the leper beseeching Jesus for healing, in the other with Jesus beseeching God for the cup to pass from him. Both rely on if-clauses: “if you are willing, you can,” “if it is possible, but thy will be done”; the leper prays to “the Lord” as or through Jesus, and Jesus prays to God the Father. This article explores what is at stake theologically in this narrative analogy within the wider interplay of will and power in Matthew’s narrative. It argues that Jesus and the leper model different forms of prayerful trust in providence, and that Matthew contrasts this with wrong grammars of mistrust modeled by other gospel characters whose “if” clauses challenge Jesus to demonstrate power. It suggests that Matthew’s emplotment of the leper story highlights the providential ordering of the gospel that rests on abiding structures of hospitality and friendship between Jesus and the outcasts of society, even where his apostles fall short. Thus Matthew turns our attention to both the forward-looking application of providence, where an individual prays from within a situation of need, and the retrospective application of providence, where people reflect on connections between past events and discern patterns of divine compassion at work. Providence emerges as a practical doctrine pertinent to Christian prayer.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Theological Interpretation
Published
2025-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5325/jtheointe.19.1.0052
Primary Topic
Biblical Studies and Interpretation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Leper and Gethsemane: Will and Power in Matthean Narratives of Prayer and Providence

Jane Heath
Journal of Theological Interpretation
Biblical Studies and Interpretation
article

The Leper and Gethsemane: Will and Power in Matthean Narratives of Prayer and Providence

Jane Heath
article en

Abstract

Abstract Jesus’s healing of the leper in Matt 8:2 and his prayers in Gethsemane in Matt 26:39, 42, 44 both involve a dialectical interplay of language of will and power, in the one case with the leper beseeching Jesus for healing, in the other with Jesus beseeching God for the cup to pass from him. Both rely on if-clauses: “if you are willing, you can,” “if it is possible, but thy will be done”; the leper prays to “the Lord” as or through Jesus, and Jesus prays to God the Father. This article explores what is at stake theologically in this narrative analogy within the wider interplay of will and power in Matthew’s narrative. It argues that Jesus and the leper model different forms of prayerful trust in providence, and that Matthew contrasts this with wrong grammars of mistrust modeled by other gospel characters whose “if” clauses challenge Jesus to demonstrate power. It suggests that Matthew’s emplotment of the leper story highlights the providential ordering of the gospel that rests on abiding structures of hospitality and friendship between Jesus and the outcasts of society, even where his apostles fall short. Thus Matthew turns our attention to both the forward-looking application of providence, where an individual prays from within a situation of need, and the retrospective application of providence, where people reflect on connections between past events and discern patterns of divine compassion at work. Providence emerges as a practical doctrine pertinent to Christian prayer.

Journal of Theological InterpretationVol. 19(1)
Durham University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Biblical Studies and Interpretation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.