Editor’s Note

To honor the twenty-fifth anniversary of Stephen E. Fowl, Engaging Scripture: A Model for Theological Interpretation (Blackwell, 1998), the Theological Interpretation of Scripture Seminar hosted a review panel on Saturday, 23 November 2024, at the Annual Meeting of the AAR/SBL in San Diego, California. Amy Peeler presided. The panelists were Brad East, Elizabeth Mburu, Chris Tilling, and Erin Heim. Stephen Fowl then responded. These remarks have been excerpted for publication here because of their certain interest to the readership of this journal. (Tilling’s remarks do not appear, since they are being prepared for publication in another venue.) It is fitting for this journal to honor the anniversary of Fowl’s widely read and reviewed book, since it made a significant contribution to the origins of theological interpretation as a new area of robust interest in theology and biblical studies—indeed, to the birth of this journal itself. As the remarks of the panelists thoughtfully illustrate, this is therefore an opportune moment to reflect on the past, present, and future of theological interpretation, to take stock of our shared conversation around Scripture and theology, and to thank Dr. Fowl for providing us with an enduring legacy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Theological Interpretation
Published
2025-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5325/jtheointe.19.1.0129
Primary Topic
Pentecostalism and Christianity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Editor’s Note

Stephen B. Chapman
Journal of Theological Interpretation
Pentecostalism and Christianity Studies
article

Editor’s Note

Stephen B. Chapman
article en

Abstract

To honor the twenty-fifth anniversary of Stephen E. Fowl, Engaging Scripture: A Model for Theological Interpretation (Blackwell, 1998), the Theological Interpretation of Scripture Seminar hosted a review panel on Saturday, 23 November 2024, at the Annual Meeting of the AAR/SBL in San Diego, California. Amy Peeler presided. The panelists were Brad East, Elizabeth Mburu, Chris Tilling, and Erin Heim. Stephen Fowl then responded. These remarks have been excerpted for publication here because of their certain interest to the readership of this journal. (Tilling’s remarks do not appear, since they are being prepared for publication in another venue.) It is fitting for this journal to honor the anniversary of Fowl’s widely read and reviewed book, since it made a significant contribution to the origins of theological interpretation as a new area of robust interest in theology and biblical studies—indeed, to the birth of this journal itself. As the remarks of the panelists thoughtfully illustrate, this is therefore an opportune moment to reflect on the past, present, and future of theological interpretation, to take stock of our shared conversation around Scripture and theology, and to thank Dr. Fowl for providing us with an enduring legacy.

Journal of Theological InterpretationVol. 19(1)
Duke University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Pentecostalism and Christianity Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.