Civil society versus banks: Bottom-up pressure in sustainable finance

Banks worldwide are increasingly under the scrutiny of CSOs (Civil Society Organizations). This bottom-up pressure remains overlooked in the rapidly expanding literature on the politics of sustainable finance. With a focus on environmental (mis)conduct, the paper investigates the corporate shaming of banks by Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) and grassroots groups. The empirical investigation of this outside lobbying is articulated in three questions: (1) What are the environmental issues for which CSOs shame banks? (2) Which CSOs shame banks? and (3) Which banks are shamed by CSOs? Corporate and political opportunity structures are considered in a multivariate analysis to examine how the risk of CSO criticism varies across banks and countries. The empirical exploration covers CSO advocacy against the Top-1000 banks worldwide for the period 2010–2022. The paper relies on data from Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) controversies. This kind of data on corporate reputation is of policy significance but remains underused in political research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Competition & Change
Published
2025-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10245294251341553
Primary Topic
Global Financial Regulation and Crises
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Civil society versus banks: Bottom-up pressure in sustainable finance

Roy Gava
Competition & Change
Global Financial Regulation and Crises
article

Civil society versus banks: Bottom-up pressure in sustainable finance

Roy Gava
article en

Abstract

Banks worldwide are increasingly under the scrutiny of CSOs (Civil Society Organizations). This bottom-up pressure remains overlooked in the rapidly expanding literature on the politics of sustainable finance. With a focus on environmental (mis)conduct, the paper investigates the corporate shaming of banks by Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) and grassroots groups. The empirical investigation of this outside lobbying is articulated in three questions: (1) What are the environmental issues for which CSOs shame banks? (2) Which CSOs shame banks? and (3) Which banks are shamed by CSOs? Corporate and political opportunity structures are considered in a multivariate analysis to examine how the risk of CSO criticism varies across banks and countries. The empirical exploration covers CSO advocacy against the Top-1000 banks worldwide for the period 2010–2022. The paper relies on data from Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) controversies. This kind of data on corporate reputation is of policy significance but remains underused in political research.

Competition & Change
University of St.Gallen (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Global Financial Regulation and Crises
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.