From fear to support? The role of benefit guarantees in EU multilevel welfare governance

Recent transnational challenges have spurred calls for an enhanced European Union (EU) social agenda. However, citizens in countries with strong welfare systems fear that increased EU involvement could trigger a ‘race-to-the-bottom’ in benefits. This article examines whether these concerns can be mitigated by guaranteeing existing welfare standards. Using a vignette experiment in Belgium, the analysis explores public preferences for welfare governance within the EU multilevel system, conditional on safeguarding benefit levels. The findings show that, when benefit levels are guaranteed, support for the presented welfare policy is generally neutral to positive across governance levels. This suggests that fears of a ‘race-to-the-bottom’ can be alleviated when citizens are confident that welfare standards will be maintained. Despite hesitant endorsement of alternative governance arrangements, preference for the status quo persists.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Union Politics
Published
2025-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14651165251340208
Primary Topic
Social Policy and Reform Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From fear to support? The role of benefit guarantees in EU multilevel welfare governance

Ann‐Kathrin Reinl
1 links
European Union Politics
Social Policy and Reform Studies
article

From fear to support? The role of benefit guarantees in EU multilevel welfare governance

Ann‐Kathrin Reinl
article en

Abstract

Recent transnational challenges have spurred calls for an enhanced European Union (EU) social agenda. However, citizens in countries with strong welfare systems fear that increased EU involvement could trigger a ‘race-to-the-bottom’ in benefits. This article examines whether these concerns can be mitigated by guaranteeing existing welfare standards. Using a vignette experiment in Belgium, the analysis explores public preferences for welfare governance within the EU multilevel system, conditional on safeguarding benefit levels. The findings show that, when benefit levels are guaranteed, support for the presented welfare policy is generally neutral to positive across governance levels. This suggests that fears of a ‘race-to-the-bottom’ can be alleviated when citizens are confident that welfare standards will be maintained. Despite hesitant endorsement of alternative governance arrangements, preference for the status quo persists.

European Union PoliticsVol. 26(3)
GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences (DE)
European University Institute, Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Social Policy and Reform Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.