Washing Dirty Laundry: A Corpus Linguistic Analysis of Fashion Firms’ Webpage Sustainability Discourse

This study analyzed and compared the sustainability discourse on websites of fashion firms judged as high-rated or low-rated in sustainability ratings by an independent verification body using corpus linguistic techniques. We found that while both types of firms showcase their environmental and social performances to represent a sustainable image, they differ significantly in various aspects. High-rated firms proactively disclose details on workers’ wages and their environmental impacts and reveal hidden industry norms to drive a change from within the industry. Contrarily, low-rated firms are vague about disclosing details regarding workers’ wages and advocate consumer-driven and market-based solutions for industry problems, highlighting a multi-stakeholder approach. We argue that what separates high and low-rated firms regarding their sustainability discourse is their level of transparency and their attitude toward industry-wide problems. We summarize a list of potential greenwashing indicators based on these findings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Business Communication
Published
2025-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/23294884251336358
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Environmental Sustainability in Business
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.15
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Washing Dirty Laundry: A Corpus Linguistic Analysis of Fashion Firms’ Webpage Sustainability Discourse

Mark Ryan, Yingnian Tao
2 citations
International Journal of Business Communication
Environmental Sustainability in Business
4.15
article

Washing Dirty Laundry: A Corpus Linguistic Analysis of Fashion Firms’ Webpage Sustainability Discourse

Mark Ryan, Yingnian Tao
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This study analyzed and compared the sustainability discourse on websites of fashion firms judged as high-rated or low-rated in sustainability ratings by an independent verification body using corpus linguistic techniques. We found that while both types of firms showcase their environmental and social performances to represent a sustainable image, they differ significantly in various aspects. High-rated firms proactively disclose details on workers’ wages and their environmental impacts and reveal hidden industry norms to drive a change from within the industry. Contrarily, low-rated firms are vague about disclosing details regarding workers’ wages and advocate consumer-driven and market-based solutions for industry problems, highlighting a multi-stakeholder approach. We argue that what separates high and low-rated firms regarding their sustainability discourse is their level of transparency and their attitude toward industry-wide problems. We summarize a list of potential greenwashing indicators based on these findings.

International Journal of Business Communication
Lancaster University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Environmental Sustainability in Business
4.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.