Which financial indicators do stakeholders have to focus on to manage risk of bank failure?

Purpose This study aims to examine the informational content of financial disclosures from banks to identify the determinants that enable stakeholders and regulators to prevent the risk of bank failure. Design/methodology/approach This study is based on European bank database from 2010 to 2021. The authors classified the variables into groups based on their nature. Z-score return on assets (ROA) and Z-score return on risk-weighted assets (RORWA) were used to test these determinants. This study used the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator and applied the approaches proposed by Ahrens et al. (2020). The selected indicators were analysed using the theoretical framework of positive and normative accounting theories. Findings A selection of indicators from four groups of variables stands out because of their high coefficients in all samples: financial instruments, income statement impact, loan quality and macroeconomic variables. The selected groups of indicators are similar for all banks. However, the indicators selected to identify banking distress vary according to bank category (global systemically important banks (G-SIBs), domestic systemically important banks (D-SIBs) and financial conglomerates (FICO)). This study shows the importance of investment portfolio risk management and its impact on bank performance. Secondly, it highlights the informative value of the loan loss provisioning indicator and the default rate introduced by International Financial Reporting Standards 9. Finally, this study discusses the role of financial information and accounting standards theory as a decision-making tool for future activities. Originality/value This study is among the few to study the impact of financial distress in Europe during the study period using big data from Pillar 3 bank reports and machine learning methods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Review of Accounting and Finance
Published
2025-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/raf-04-2024-0155
Primary Topic
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Which financial indicators do stakeholders have to focus on to manage risk of bank failure?

Éric Lamarque, Zinaba Atman
Review of Accounting and Finance
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
article

Which financial indicators do stakeholders have to focus on to manage risk of bank failure?

Éric Lamarque, Zinaba Atman
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to examine the informational content of financial disclosures from banks to identify the determinants that enable stakeholders and regulators to prevent the risk of bank failure. Design/methodology/approach This study is based on European bank database from 2010 to 2021. The authors classified the variables into groups based on their nature. Z-score return on assets (ROA) and Z-score return on risk-weighted assets (RORWA) were used to test these determinants. This study used the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator and applied the approaches proposed by Ahrens et al. (2020). The selected indicators were analysed using the theoretical framework of positive and normative accounting theories. Findings A selection of indicators from four groups of variables stands out because of their high coefficients in all samples: financial instruments, income statement impact, loan quality and macroeconomic variables. The selected groups of indicators are similar for all banks. However, the indicators selected to identify banking distress vary according to bank category (global systemically important banks (G-SIBs), domestic systemically important banks (D-SIBs) and financial conglomerates (FICO)). This study shows the importance of investment portfolio risk management and its impact on bank performance. Secondly, it highlights the informative value of the loan loss provisioning indicator and the default rate introduced by International Financial Reporting Standards 9. Finally, this study discusses the role of financial information and accounting standards theory as a decision-making tool for future activities. Originality/value This study is among the few to study the impact of financial distress in Europe during the study period using big data from Pillar 3 bank reports and machine learning methods.

Review of Accounting and FinanceVol. 24(4)
Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.