Narrative Medicine and the Uses of Literature

This article offers an overview of narrative medicine as a field, exploring the interdisciplinary possibilities at the intersection of literature and medicine. The intensified biotechnologization of medicine in the latter half of the twentieth century has prompted increasing calls to “humanize” medical practices. In response, medical humanists have introduced elements of literary studies into medical education, emphasizing the narrative form and its attention to particularity as an antidote to the reductionism of biomedical hegemony. While these efforts have achieved institutional success, early models of narrative medicine have recently come under critique from emerging strands of second-wave medical humanities―that is, health humanities and critical medical humanities―for instrumentalizing literary studies without sufficiently engaging humanities methodologies. Critics argue that traditional approaches to narrative medicine often rely on a limited understanding of what narrative form is, centering on a culturally specific, individualist model of self typically associated with the first-person voice. Recent scholarship, drawing on more nuanced understandings of narrative form and literary theory, seeks to broaden the scope of narrative medicine beyond the confines of the clinical encounter, exploring the diverse ways narrative practices can shape, critique, and reimagine medical knowledge and care.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
In/Outside English Studies in Korea
Published
2025-05-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46645/inoutsesk.58.8
Primary Topic
Empathy and Medical Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Narrative Medicine and the Uses of Literature

Haejoo Kim
In/Outside English Studies in Korea
Empathy and Medical Education
article

Narrative Medicine and the Uses of Literature

Haejoo Kim
article en

Abstract

This article offers an overview of narrative medicine as a field, exploring the interdisciplinary possibilities at the intersection of literature and medicine. The intensified biotechnologization of medicine in the latter half of the twentieth century has prompted increasing calls to “humanize” medical practices. In response, medical humanists have introduced elements of literary studies into medical education, emphasizing the narrative form and its attention to particularity as an antidote to the reductionism of biomedical hegemony. While these efforts have achieved institutional success, early models of narrative medicine have recently come under critique from emerging strands of second-wave medical humanities―that is, health humanities and critical medical humanities―for instrumentalizing literary studies without sufficiently engaging humanities methodologies. Critics argue that traditional approaches to narrative medicine often rely on a limited understanding of what narrative form is, centering on a culturally specific, individualist model of self typically associated with the first-person voice. Recent scholarship, drawing on more nuanced understandings of narrative form and literary theory, seeks to broaden the scope of narrative medicine beyond the confines of the clinical encounter, exploring the diverse ways narrative practices can shape, critique, and reimagine medical knowledge and care.

In/Outside English Studies in KoreaVol. 58(0)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Empathy and Medical Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.