Association between conicity index and frailty in older Americans: the NHANES cross-sectional study, 2007–2018

This study utilized NHANES data from 2007 to 2018 to investigate the correlation between frailty and the Conicity Index (CI) in individuals aged 60 and above in the United States. The study used NHANES data from 2007 to 2018.CI was calculated as CI = wc / [0.109 × sqrt(bw / Height)]. Frailty was assessed by the frailty index (≥ 0.25). Weighted multivariate logistic regression analysis, subgroup analyses, and interaction tests were used to investigate the connection between CI and the prevalence of frailty. Generalized additive modeling (GAM) was employed to address any non-linear patterns, and the predictive capability of CI for frailty was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. With a 69% rise in the prevalence of frailty for every 0.1 unit increase in the fully adjusted model, the results demonstrated a strong and positive relationship between CI and frailty prevalence (OR: 1.69, 95% CI: 1.53,1.86; P < 0.001). When CI was categorized, the group with the highest CI had a significantly higher prevalence of frailty than the group with the lowest CI (OR = 2.79, 95% CI: 2.22,3.51; P < 0.001). The association between CI and prevalence of frailty was significant in all subgroups. In addition, statistically significant interactions were present in most subgroups. When the CI > reached 1.35, the GAM model demonstrated a threshold effect and a significant nonlinear connection, with a 105% rise in the prevalence of frailty for every 0.1 unit increase in CI. In the male group, CI was a significantly greater indicator of the prevalence of frailty than both BMI and WC. According to this study, frailty in older persons is substantially correlated with a higher CI. Although greater confirmation in large-scale prospective research is required, this study indicates that increased CI is a more reliable predictor of the prevalence of frailty in older men and is significantly linked with its occurrence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-02455-4
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Frailty in Older Adults
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.45
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Association between conicity index and frailty in older Americans: the NHANES cross-sectional study, 2007–2018

Jie Xu, Jiaming Cui, Meng Chen, Xiaobing Luo
2 citations
Scientific Reports
Frailty in Older Adults
2.45
article

Association between conicity index and frailty in older Americans: the NHANES cross-sectional study, 2007–2018

Jie Xu, Jiaming Cui, Meng Chen, Xiaobing Luo
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This study utilized NHANES data from 2007 to 2018 to investigate the correlation between frailty and the Conicity Index (CI) in individuals aged 60 and above in the United States. The study used NHANES data from 2007 to 2018.CI was calculated as CI = wc / [0.109 × sqrt(bw / Height)]. Frailty was assessed by the frailty index (≥ 0.25). Weighted multivariate logistic regression analysis, subgroup analyses, and interaction tests were used to investigate the connection between CI and the prevalence of frailty. Generalized additive modeling (GAM) was employed to address any non-linear patterns, and the predictive capability of CI for frailty was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. With a 69% rise in the prevalence of frailty for every 0.1 unit increase in the fully adjusted model, the results demonstrated a strong and positive relationship between CI and frailty prevalence (OR: 1.69, 95% CI: 1.53,1.86; P < 0.001). When CI was categorized, the group with the highest CI had a significantly higher prevalence of frailty than the group with the lowest CI (OR = 2.79, 95% CI: 2.22,3.51; P < 0.001). The association between CI and prevalence of frailty was significant in all subgroups. In addition, statistically significant interactions were present in most subgroups. When the CI > reached 1.35, the GAM model demonstrated a threshold effect and a significant nonlinear connection, with a 105% rise in the prevalence of frailty for every 0.1 unit increase in CI. In the male group, CI was a significantly greater indicator of the prevalence of frailty than both BMI and WC. According to this study, frailty in older persons is substantially correlated with a higher CI. Although greater confirmation in large-scale prospective research is required, this study indicates that increased CI is a more reliable predictor of the prevalence of frailty in older men and is significantly linked with its occurrence.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Sichuan Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine (CN), Anyang Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine (CN)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Frailty in Older Adults
2.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.