Attackers Can Do Better: Over- and Understated Factors of Model Stealing Attacks

Machine learning (ML) models were shown to be vulnerable to model stealing attacks, which lead to intellectual property infringement. Among other attack methods, substitute model training is an all-encompassing attack applicable to any machine learning model whose behaviour can be approximated from input-output queries. Whereas previous works mainly focused on improving the performance of substitute models by, e.g. developing a new substitute training method, there have been only limited ablation studies that try to understand the impact the strength of an attacker has on the substitute model's performance. As a result, different authors came to diverse, sometimes contradicting, conclusions. In this work, we exhaustively examine the ambivalent influence of different factors resulting from varying the attacker's capabilities and knowledge on a substitute training attack. Our findings suggest that some of the factors that have been considered important in the past are, in fact, not that influential; instead, we discover new correlations between attack conditions and success rate. In particular, we demonstrate that better-performing target models enable higher-fidelity attacks and explain the intuition behind this phenomenon. Further, we propose to shift the focus from the complexity of target models toward the complexity of their learning tasks. Therefore, for the substitute model, rather than aiming for a higher architecture complexity, we suggest focusing on getting data of higher complexity and an appropriate architecture. Finally, we demonstrate that even in the most limited data-free scenario, there is no need to overcompensate weak knowledge with unrealistic capabilities in the form of millions of queries. Our results often exceed or match the performance of previous attacks that assume a stronger attacker, suggesting that these stronger attacks are likely endangering a model owner's intellectual property to a significantly higher degree than shown until now.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-04-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/satml64287.2025.00016
Primary Topic
Network Security and Intrusion Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Attackers Can Do Better: Over- and Understated Factors of Model Stealing Attacks

Rudolf Mayer, Andreas Rauber, Daryna Oliynyk
Network Security and Intrusion Detection
article

Attackers Can Do Better: Over- and Understated Factors of Model Stealing Attacks

Rudolf Mayer, Andreas Rauber, Daryna Oliynyk
article en

Abstract

Machine learning (ML) models were shown to be vulnerable to model stealing attacks, which lead to intellectual property infringement. Among other attack methods, substitute model training is an all-encompassing attack applicable to any machine learning model whose behaviour can be approximated from input-output queries. Whereas previous works mainly focused on improving the performance of substitute models by, e.g. developing a new substitute training method, there have been only limited ablation studies that try to understand the impact the strength of an attacker has on the substitute model's performance. As a result, different authors came to diverse, sometimes contradicting, conclusions. In this work, we exhaustively examine the ambivalent influence of different factors resulting from varying the attacker's capabilities and knowledge on a substitute training attack. Our findings suggest that some of the factors that have been considered important in the past are, in fact, not that influential; instead, we discover new correlations between attack conditions and success rate. In particular, we demonstrate that better-performing target models enable higher-fidelity attacks and explain the intuition behind this phenomenon. Further, we propose to shift the focus from the complexity of target models toward the complexity of their learning tasks. Therefore, for the substitute model, rather than aiming for a higher architecture complexity, we suggest focusing on getting data of higher complexity and an appropriate architecture. Finally, we demonstrate that even in the most limited data-free scenario, there is no need to overcompensate weak knowledge with unrealistic capabilities in the form of millions of queries. Our results often exceed or match the performance of previous attacks that assume a stronger attacker, suggesting that these stronger attacks are likely endangering a model owner's intellectual property to a significantly higher degree than shown until now.

University of Vienna (AT), TU Wien (AT), SBA Research (AT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Network Security and Intrusion Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.