Jugular vein vascular access ports for serial pig blood sampling in high biocontainment infectious disease studies

Effective manual or chemical restraint of pigs for blood collection is crucial when conducting infectious disease research under high biocontainment laboratory conditions; however, these methods can introduce stress and physiological disruption. We aimed to establish proof-of-concept for the use of jugular vein vascular access ports (VAPs) for repeated, conscious blood collection in both individually and group housed pigs, trained using a positive reinforcement training regime. In study 1, pigs were housed individually, with three pigs implanted with VAPs. An additional control pig was not implanted with VAPs and was anaesthetised for all blood collections. Daily assessments of behaviour were conducted and saliva collected for corticosterone analysis. In study 2, pigs were housed in a group, with three pigs implanted with VAPs. Three control pigs were not implanted with VAPs and were anaesthetised for all blood collections. To assess the physiological impacts of both blood collection methods, heart rate variability, pulse rate and rectal temperature were assessed during a blood collection event. Across both studies 31 of 33 VAP blood collections were successful, with the remaining two collections successful using light sedation. An initial time and cost investment was required for VAP implantation, but the time required to collect blood via VAPs was halved compared to anaesthetising pigs for blood collection. One pig died during VAP surgery from anaesthesia-related complications. Pigs implanted with VAPs displayed low negative and high positive behaviour scores, low salivary corticosterone levels, and maintained steady clinical parameters during a blood collection event, whilst anaesthetised pigs displayed reduced HRV and temperature and increased pulse rate. This study provides proof-of-concept and recommendations for using VAPs in trained pigs under high biocontainment, as a welfare-positive method of conscious, repeated blood collection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Animal Science
Published
2025-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fanim.2025.1573822
Primary Topic
Viral Infections and Immunology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Jugular vein vascular access ports for serial pig blood sampling in high biocontainment infectious disease studies

David T. Williams, Elisha Soldani, Matthew Boyd, Daniel Layton et al.
Frontiers in Animal Science
Viral Infections and Immunology Research
article

Jugular vein vascular access ports for serial pig blood sampling in high biocontainment infectious disease studies

David T. Williams, Elisha Soldani, Matthew Boyd, Daniel Layton, DS Beggs, Todd M. Allen, Graham W. Taylor, Rachel Layton, Kelly J. Stanger, Peter Mansell, Andrew Fisher, Sarah Riddell
article en

Abstract

Effective manual or chemical restraint of pigs for blood collection is crucial when conducting infectious disease research under high biocontainment laboratory conditions; however, these methods can introduce stress and physiological disruption. We aimed to establish proof-of-concept for the use of jugular vein vascular access ports (VAPs) for repeated, conscious blood collection in both individually and group housed pigs, trained using a positive reinforcement training regime. In study 1, pigs were housed individually, with three pigs implanted with VAPs. An additional control pig was not implanted with VAPs and was anaesthetised for all blood collections. Daily assessments of behaviour were conducted and saliva collected for corticosterone analysis. In study 2, pigs were housed in a group, with three pigs implanted with VAPs. Three control pigs were not implanted with VAPs and were anaesthetised for all blood collections. To assess the physiological impacts of both blood collection methods, heart rate variability, pulse rate and rectal temperature were assessed during a blood collection event. Across both studies 31 of 33 VAP blood collections were successful, with the remaining two collections successful using light sedation. An initial time and cost investment was required for VAP implantation, but the time required to collect blood via VAPs was halved compared to anaesthetising pigs for blood collection. One pig died during VAP surgery from anaesthesia-related complications. Pigs implanted with VAPs displayed low negative and high positive behaviour scores, low salivary corticosterone levels, and maintained steady clinical parameters during a blood collection event, whilst anaesthetised pigs displayed reduced HRV and temperature and increased pulse rate. This study provides proof-of-concept and recommendations for using VAPs in trained pigs under high biocontainment, as a welfare-positive method of conscious, repeated blood collection.

Frontiers in Animal ScienceVol. 6
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU), Australian Centre for Disease Preparedness (AU), The University of Melbourne (AU), CSIRO Health and Biosecurity (AU)
Australian Government, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Viral Infections and Immunology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.