Power generation overcapacity in selected sub-Saharan African countries: political-economic drivers and grid infrastructure challenges

Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) faces a persistent energy crisis, with 600 million people lacking access to electricity. Since the 1990s, government-led reforms have facilitated Independent Power Producers (IPPs) in adding 29.3 GW from 371 projects between 2000 and 2024. However, by 2018, inadequate grid investment had led to overcapacity in some countries while millions remained without electricity, creating a paradox. This study examined the role of political economy, the IPP model, the funding gap in transmission and grid extension, and the impact of renewable energy project development on overcapacity in the power generation sector of SSA. The analysis was based on data from international organizations involved in energy and economic development, national energy plans and reports, and both primary and secondary research. Case studies from Ghana, South Africa, and Ethiopia were selected due to documented overcapacity challenges. The findings revealed that political influence, misaligned investments, and weak grid infrastructure are key contributing factors to overcapacity. Between 2001 and 2023, 97% of private investment was directed towards generation, while only 0.2% supported transmission expansion, leaving grids underfunded. Additionally, 43% of generation projects were awarded through direct negotiations and confidential agreements, resulting in inefficiencies and inflated costs. Take-or-pay Power Purchase Agreements have further exacerbated excess capacity, while transmission delays and weak regional interconnections continue to keep much of the capacity underutilized. Given these points, overcapacity in SSA’s power generation sector is a result of politically driven investments that overlook demand and grid capacity requirements leading to inefficiencies and financial strain. To address this challenge, governments should increase grid expansion investments, enhance regulatory transparency, reform procurement and strengthen regional electricity trade.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Energy Research
Published
2025-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2025.1549844
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Energy and Environment Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Power generation overcapacity in selected sub-Saharan African countries: political-economic drivers and grid infrastructure challenges

Geofrey Bakkabulindi, Vedaste Ndayishimiye, Deborah Nibagwire, Emmanuel Wokulira Miyingo
4 citations
Frontiers in Energy Research
Energy and Environment Impacts
2.01
article

Power generation overcapacity in selected sub-Saharan African countries: political-economic drivers and grid infrastructure challenges

Geofrey Bakkabulindi, Vedaste Ndayishimiye, Deborah Nibagwire, Emmanuel Wokulira Miyingo
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) faces a persistent energy crisis, with 600 million people lacking access to electricity. Since the 1990s, government-led reforms have facilitated Independent Power Producers (IPPs) in adding 29.3 GW from 371 projects between 2000 and 2024. However, by 2018, inadequate grid investment had led to overcapacity in some countries while millions remained without electricity, creating a paradox. This study examined the role of political economy, the IPP model, the funding gap in transmission and grid extension, and the impact of renewable energy project development on overcapacity in the power generation sector of SSA. The analysis was based on data from international organizations involved in energy and economic development, national energy plans and reports, and both primary and secondary research. Case studies from Ghana, South Africa, and Ethiopia were selected due to documented overcapacity challenges. The findings revealed that political influence, misaligned investments, and weak grid infrastructure are key contributing factors to overcapacity. Between 2001 and 2023, 97% of private investment was directed towards generation, while only 0.2% supported transmission expansion, leaving grids underfunded. Additionally, 43% of generation projects were awarded through direct negotiations and confidential agreements, resulting in inefficiencies and inflated costs. Take-or-pay Power Purchase Agreements have further exacerbated excess capacity, while transmission delays and weak regional interconnections continue to keep much of the capacity underutilized. Given these points, overcapacity in SSA’s power generation sector is a result of politically driven investments that overlook demand and grid capacity requirements leading to inefficiencies and financial strain. To address this challenge, governments should increase grid expansion investments, enhance regulatory transparency, reform procurement and strengthen regional electricity trade.

Frontiers in Energy ResearchVol. 13
Pan-Atlantic University (NG), Makerere University (UG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Energy and Environment Impacts
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.