Developmental Trajectory of Children's Epistemic Trust Decision for Mathematical and Relative Information

ABSTRACT This study aimed to determine which type of information source—providing either mathematical or relative data—children aged 5–11 would prefer. Additionally, the study examined how children justified their choices and whether differences existed in their justifications. A total of 837 children participated in the study. The children watched videos of two information sources: one who made decisions based on mathematical data and another who relied on personal opinions. They then answered three questions about which source they would consult regarding an unfamiliar topic. They also explained why they preferred the source they chose more frequently. Regression analysis revealed that as age increased, the likelihood of choosing the mathematical (precise) informant as the information source significantly increased. Furthermore, with age, children were more likely to justify their selections based on objective, measurement‐based reasoning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Cognitive Psychology
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.70070
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Developmental Trajectory of Children's Epistemic Trust Decision for Mathematical and Relative Information

Hüseyin Kotaman, Aslı Balci
1 citations
Applied Cognitive Psychology
Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
3.44
article

Developmental Trajectory of Children's Epistemic Trust Decision for Mathematical and Relative Information

Hüseyin Kotaman, Aslı Balci
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study aimed to determine which type of information source—providing either mathematical or relative data—children aged 5–11 would prefer. Additionally, the study examined how children justified their choices and whether differences existed in their justifications. A total of 837 children participated in the study. The children watched videos of two information sources: one who made decisions based on mathematical data and another who relied on personal opinions. They then answered three questions about which source they would consult regarding an unfamiliar topic. They also explained why they preferred the source they chose more frequently. Regression analysis revealed that as age increased, the likelihood of choosing the mathematical (precise) informant as the information source significantly increased. Furthermore, with age, children were more likely to justify their selections based on objective, measurement‐based reasoning.

Applied Cognitive PsychologyVol. 39(3)
Atatürk University (TR), Harran University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
3.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.