Constraints on the Evolution of an Overluminous Blue Supergiant from its Parent Open Cluster, vdBH 245

Abstract In this paper, we constrain the properties of an overluminous blue supergiant star (BSG) in the open cluster vdBH 245. We confirm the cluster membership of a sample of early-to-mid B-type stars using their proper motions, parallaxes, and radial velocities. We measure the stellar parameters through a spectrophotometric analysis of their optical spectra and near-infrared photometry. We correct for the effects of extinction of the cluster’s light and estimate a most likely age range for vdBH 245 of 31.6 <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mrow/> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>−</mml:mo> <mml:mn>13.8</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> <mml:mn>13.1</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msubsup> </mml:math> Myr using the Binary Population and Spectral Synthesis (or BPASS) Python software hoki and models from the Geneva group. We find a distance of 2.0 ± 0.2 kpc for the cluster, consistent with the value estimated by Gaia of 2.6 ± 0.5 kpc. However, the new age estimate does not agree with previous studies that have found much younger ages. We find that single-star evolution alone is unable to explain the BSG in that age range, even when considering the impact of rotation on stellar evolution. Instead, we find that the overluminous B8–B9 Ia BSG could be interpreted as a merger between two stars with initial masses ranging from 8.5–12.0 M ⊙ and 1.1–10.8 M ⊙ , with a current mass in the range of 13.4–20.6 M ⊙ . The merger would have occurred somewhere between 5.0 and 21.0 Myr after the cluster’s formation. The discovery of such a BSG appearing too young (≈10 Myr in the single-star paradigm) for its population hints at the importance of considering binary interactions to explain the observed population of Galactic BSGs.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2025-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/adc90d
Primary Topic
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Constraints on the Evolution of an Overluminous Blue Supergiant from its Parent Open Cluster, vdBH 245

Leigh C. Smith, Nicole St‐Louis, Anthony Hervé, F. Martins et al.
1 links
The Astrophysical Journal
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
article

Constraints on the Evolution of an Overluminous Blue Supergiant from its Parent Open Cluster, vdBH 245

Leigh C. Smith, Nicole St‐Louis, Anthony Hervé, F. Martins, André-Nicolas Chené, S. Ramírez Alegría, Karla Peña Ramírez, Alexandre Legault, Kaimi Kahihikolo
article en

Abstract

Abstract In this paper, we constrain the properties of an overluminous blue supergiant star (BSG) in the open cluster vdBH 245. We confirm the cluster membership of a sample of early-to-mid B-type stars using their proper motions, parallaxes, and radial velocities. We measure the stellar parameters through a spectrophotometric analysis of their optical spectra and near-infrared photometry. We correct for the effects of extinction of the cluster’s light and estimate a most likely age range for vdBH 245 of 31.6 <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mrow/> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>−</mml:mo> <mml:mn>13.8</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> <mml:mn>13.1</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msubsup> </mml:math> Myr using the Binary Population and Spectral Synthesis (or BPASS) Python software hoki and models from the Geneva group. We find a distance of 2.0 ± 0.2 kpc for the cluster, consistent with the value estimated by Gaia of 2.6 ± 0.5 kpc. However, the new age estimate does not agree with previous studies that have found much younger ages. We find that single-star evolution alone is unable to explain the BSG in that age range, even when considering the impact of rotation on stellar evolution. Instead, we find that the overluminous B8–B9 Ia BSG could be interpreted as a merger between two stars with initial masses ranging from 8.5–12.0 M ⊙ and 1.1–10.8 M ⊙ , with a current mass in the range of 13.4–20.6 M ⊙ . The merger would have occurred somewhere between 5.0 and 21.0 Myr after the cluster’s formation. The discovery of such a BSG appearing too young (≈10 Myr in the single-star paradigm) for its population hints at the importance of considering binary interactions to explain the observed population of Galactic BSGs.

The Astrophysical JournalVol. 985(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.