Decision making of male same-sex couples pursuing pregnancy via assisted reproductive technology: a qualitative study

Decision-making of male same-sex couples pursuing ART is complex and unique to each couple. There are many stages throughout the process that require complicated decision-making; however, decisions are often shaped by the desire for genetic relatedness, risk reduction, control, and financial costs. Male same-sex couples often must make decisions without evidence-based medicine; thus, better clinical guidance is needed to allow reproductive experts to facilitate these delicate conversations and improve the experience of intended parents. The high cost makes the process more difficult for many couples, requiring many to make sacrifices and leaving many unable to pursue ART to build their families. Better insurance coverage needs to be made available to improve care for this marginalized patient population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
F&S Reports
Published
2025-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xfre.2025.05.007
Primary Topic
Reproductive Health and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Decision making of male same-sex couples pursuing pregnancy via assisted reproductive technology: a qualitative study

Kimberly Zayhowski, Brent Monseur, MaryAnn Campion, Sean Dailey
F&S Reports
Reproductive Health and Technologies
article

Decision making of male same-sex couples pursuing pregnancy via assisted reproductive technology: a qualitative study

Kimberly Zayhowski, Brent Monseur, MaryAnn Campion, Sean Dailey
article en

Abstract

Decision-making of male same-sex couples pursuing ART is complex and unique to each couple. There are many stages throughout the process that require complicated decision-making; however, decisions are often shaped by the desire for genetic relatedness, risk reduction, control, and financial costs. Male same-sex couples often must make decisions without evidence-based medicine; thus, better clinical guidance is needed to allow reproductive experts to facilitate these delicate conversations and improve the experience of intended parents. The high cost makes the process more difficult for many couples, requiring many to make sacrifices and leaving many unable to pursue ART to build their families. Better insurance coverage needs to be made available to improve care for this marginalized patient population.

F&S ReportsVol. 6(3)
Boston University (US), Stanford University (US)
Stanford University, National Institutes of Health, School of Medicine, Stanford University, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Reproductive Health and Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Decision making of male same-sex couples pursuing pregnancy via assisted reproductive technology: a qualitative study — Kimberly Zayhowski, Brent Monseur, et al. · F&S Reports (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS