ARITMETICĂ, POLITICĂ ȘI IDEOLOGIE ÎN ROMÂNIA INTERBELICĂ. ALEGERILE PARLAMENTARE DIN 1931

The year 1931 and the government of Iorga-Argetoianu (1931-1932) have retained the attention of historians for many reasons. In this article, we are almost exclusively interested in the fact that, leaving aside the case of 1937, the electoral system established by the law of 1926 has never been so much and so diversely put to the test. It is not about the central, emblematic provision, namely the "electoral bonus", but about numerous other details, gaps, contradictions, which were noticed at the time of the 1931 election or can be noticed retrospectively. I think that, at this electoral moment, it was best seen how the strange electoral system worked or how it did not work, and, broadening the framework, how the interwar Romanian political system worked institutionally, beyond the much-claimed principle of the separation of powers. We analyze, both legally and mathematically, a series of hesitations and errors in the establishment of the results, and particularly the annulment of the votes obtained by the communists.

Publication Details

Journal
Analele Universităţii din Craiova seria Istorie
Published
2025-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52846/aucsi.2024.2.05
Primary Topic
Comparative and World Literature
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ARITMETICĂ, POLITICĂ ȘI IDEOLOGIE ÎN ROMÂNIA INTERBELICĂ. ALEGERILE PARLAMENTARE DIN 1931

Analele Universităţii din Craiova seria Istorie
Comparative and World Literature
article

ARITMETICĂ, POLITICĂ ȘI IDEOLOGIE ÎN ROMÂNIA INTERBELICĂ. ALEGERILE PARLAMENTARE DIN 1931

article en

Abstract

The year 1931 and the government of Iorga-Argetoianu (1931-1932) have retained the attention of historians for many reasons. In this article, we are almost exclusively interested in the fact that, leaving aside the case of 1937, the electoral system established by the law of 1926 has never been so much and so diversely put to the test. It is not about the central, emblematic provision, namely the "electoral bonus", but about numerous other details, gaps, contradictions, which were noticed at the time of the 1931 election or can be noticed retrospectively. I think that, at this electoral moment, it was best seen how the strange electoral system worked or how it did not work, and, broadening the framework, how the interwar Romanian political system worked institutionally, beyond the much-claimed principle of the separation of powers. We analyze, both legally and mathematically, a series of hesitations and errors in the establishment of the results, and particularly the annulment of the votes obtained by the communists.

Analele Universităţii din Craiova seria IstorieVol. 29(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Comparative and World Literature
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.