What Narcissists Look Like and Why It’s Important

Prior research investigating public perceptions of narcissistic individuals has relied on participant ratings of researcher-selected dimensions or character vignettes, limiting generalizability and ecological validity. Using reverse correlation-a bottom-up, participant-driven method-we examined how people visually represent narcissists, and the consequences of these representations on attributional perceptions (e.g., trust, leadership, attraction). As narcissism is commonly perceived in terms of selfishness or vanity, participants generated facial images where the selfish (Experiment 1) or vain (Experiment 2) dimensions of narcissism were made salient-resulting in selfish-narcissistic versus non-selfish faces and vain-narcissistic versus non-vain faces. Experiment 3 directly compared representations of selfish- and vain-narcissistic faces and their non-narcissistic counterparts. While narcissistic facial images were generally perceived unfavorably by naïve raters, the vain-narcissistic face was seen as more agentic (e.g., competent) and attractive than the selfish-narcissistic face. Narcissistic (vs. non-narcissistic) raters also viewed the vain-narcissistic face more favorably, an effect mediated by perceived similarity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Published
2025-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672251339014
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.24
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What Narcissists Look Like and Why It’s Important

Geoffrey Haddock, Travis Proulx, Sarah Francis Smith
2 citations
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
4.24
article

What Narcissists Look Like and Why It’s Important

Geoffrey Haddock, Travis Proulx, Sarah Francis Smith
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Prior research investigating public perceptions of narcissistic individuals has relied on participant ratings of researcher-selected dimensions or character vignettes, limiting generalizability and ecological validity. Using reverse correlation-a bottom-up, participant-driven method-we examined how people visually represent narcissists, and the consequences of these representations on attributional perceptions (e.g., trust, leadership, attraction). As narcissism is commonly perceived in terms of selfishness or vanity, participants generated facial images where the selfish (Experiment 1) or vain (Experiment 2) dimensions of narcissism were made salient-resulting in selfish-narcissistic versus non-selfish faces and vain-narcissistic versus non-vain faces. Experiment 3 directly compared representations of selfish- and vain-narcissistic faces and their non-narcissistic counterparts. While narcissistic facial images were generally perceived unfavorably by naïve raters, the vain-narcissistic face was seen as more agentic (e.g., competent) and attractive than the selfish-narcissistic face. Narcissistic (vs. non-narcissistic) raters also viewed the vain-narcissistic face more favorably, an effect mediated by perceived similarity.

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Cardiff University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
4.24
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.