The Political Roots of Gender Divergence: Democratic Consolidation and Gender Equality in Taiwan and South Korea

Abstract Throughout the twentieth century, Taiwan and South Korea underwent rapid economic development and successfully democratized without reversal to authoritarianism. Despite their similar trajectories, the two countries diverge significantly in political and public support for gender equality. Taiwan is widely seen as the most gender-equal country in Asia, while South Korea remains deeply polarized, with uneven progress in women’s representation. What accounts for this divergence between two democracies? This article advances a political institutions thesis , arguing that differences in democratic institution-building—particularly the actors and modes of democratization—have shaped the contour of gender politics of each country. Contrasting the histories of party-driven democratization in Taiwan and mass-driven democratization in South Korea, this article shows that the process of building democracy has had lasting effects on the institutionalization and sustainability of gender equality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of East Asian Studies
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/jea.2025.11
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Gender Politics and Representation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.73

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Political Roots of Gender Divergence: Democratic Consolidation and Gender Equality in Taiwan and South Korea

Min Hee Go
2 citations
Journal of East Asian Studies
Gender Politics and Representation
7.73
article

The Political Roots of Gender Divergence: Democratic Consolidation and Gender Equality in Taiwan and South Korea

Min Hee Go
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Throughout the twentieth century, Taiwan and South Korea underwent rapid economic development and successfully democratized without reversal to authoritarianism. Despite their similar trajectories, the two countries diverge significantly in political and public support for gender equality. Taiwan is widely seen as the most gender-equal country in Asia, while South Korea remains deeply polarized, with uneven progress in women’s representation. What accounts for this divergence between two democracies? This article advances a political institutions thesis , arguing that differences in democratic institution-building—particularly the actors and modes of democratization—have shaped the contour of gender politics of each country. Contrasting the histories of party-driven democratization in Taiwan and mass-driven democratization in South Korea, this article shows that the process of building democracy has had lasting effects on the institutionalization and sustainability of gender equality.

Journal of East Asian StudiesVol. 25(1)
Ewha Womans University (KR)
National Research Foundation, National Research Foundation of Korea
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Gender Politics and Representation
7.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.