Evaluating land capability using site assessment and land evaluation model in GIS in a watershed scale

Assessment of the capability of agricultural lands using a precise and systematic approach is vital to identify both the primary limitations and the potential of the land. With the growing need to protect farmlands, particularly in areas at high risk of degradation, developing an effective evaluation method is essential. This study focuses on site-specific conditions in China, where such risks are prevalent, and integrates the Land Evaluation and Site Assessment (LESA) method with ArcGIS to map and evaluate agricultural land potential. The LESA method comprises two critical components: Site Assessment (SA) and Land Evaluation (LE). SA considers non-soil related factors such as proximity to water sources, accessibility for agricultural machinery, and socio-economic considerations that affect agricultural productivity, while LE focuses on soil characteristics. The results indicate that a weighting of 0.4 was assigned to LE and 0.6 to SA, reflecting their respective importance in evaluating land potential. By integrating LESA with ArcGIS, it is categorized 7.59% of the region as "marginal land," 74.96% as "good land," and 17.45% as "best land" for crop production. Based on the results, is it recommended for lands classified as unsuitable or marginal, rangeland and agroforestry uses. We concluded that the integration of the LESA method with ArcGIS is a practical tool for land-use planners, helping to identify limitations and to optimize land-use planning for sustainable agricultural development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-95586-7
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Soil and Land Suitability Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.84
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating land capability using site assessment and land evaluation model in GIS in a watershed scale

Xuedong Zhai, Kuan‐Ching Li, Zhiyuan An, Mingxuan Yi
2 citations
Scientific Reports
Soil and Land Suitability Analysis
4.84
article

Evaluating land capability using site assessment and land evaluation model in GIS in a watershed scale

Xuedong Zhai, Kuan‐Ching Li, Zhiyuan An, Mingxuan Yi
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Assessment of the capability of agricultural lands using a precise and systematic approach is vital to identify both the primary limitations and the potential of the land. With the growing need to protect farmlands, particularly in areas at high risk of degradation, developing an effective evaluation method is essential. This study focuses on site-specific conditions in China, where such risks are prevalent, and integrates the Land Evaluation and Site Assessment (LESA) method with ArcGIS to map and evaluate agricultural land potential. The LESA method comprises two critical components: Site Assessment (SA) and Land Evaluation (LE). SA considers non-soil related factors such as proximity to water sources, accessibility for agricultural machinery, and socio-economic considerations that affect agricultural productivity, while LE focuses on soil characteristics. The results indicate that a weighting of 0.4 was assigned to LE and 0.6 to SA, reflecting their respective importance in evaluating land potential. By integrating LESA with ArcGIS, it is categorized 7.59% of the region as "marginal land," 74.96% as "good land," and 17.45% as "best land" for crop production. Based on the results, is it recommended for lands classified as unsuitable or marginal, rangeland and agroforestry uses. We concluded that the integration of the LESA method with ArcGIS is a practical tool for land-use planners, helping to identify limitations and to optimize land-use planning for sustainable agricultural development.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
China Geological Survey (CN)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Soil and Land Suitability Analysis
4.84
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.