RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING DATA AND MORTALITY ACCORDING TO THE HOSPITAL REGISTRY

Objective: Currently, the 24-h blood pressure monitoring (BPM) is often being performed in hospital conditions in patients with comorbidities, but prognostic value of these data is unclear. The aim of our study to evaluate the prognostic value of BPM results, obtained in hospitalized patients. Design and method: In a retro-prospective study based on the hospital registry of NMRC TPM, 358 patients who underwent an inpatient treatment in 2013-2015 were included into the final analysis. The inclusion criteria: permanent residence in Moscow, arterial hypertension (AH), valid BPM at the hospital stage (at least 15 measurements during the day and 3 at night), informed consent, absence of atrial fibrillation or flutter in the anamnesis. All participants were contacted by phone after 8-10 years of the reference hospitalization to establish their vital status. The statistical methods included ANOVA and survival analysis. Results: The mean age at the hospitalization stage (M±SD) was 72.9±12.0 (min - 25 years, max - 97 years), the percent of male patients - 31.0%; 77 patients died (mean age at the time of hospitalization 82.1±9.9, 20.8% males). Because of the differences in the age groups (<75 / =>75 years), mortality factors in the respective groups were analyzed separately. In the 18-74 years group (n=197), the overall mortality was jointly related with cardiovascular (CV) comorbidity (HR=3.25; 95% CI=1.14-9.22; p=0.027), the average real variability (HR=1.19; 95% CI=1.01-1.41; p=0.038) and the mean daily pulse BP (HR=1.05; 95% CI=1.02-1.09; p=0.002). There was no association with gender, age and antihypertensive therapy. In the group of patients older than 75 years (n=161), mortality was associated with age (HR=1.174; 95% CI=1.116-1.234; p<0.001) and wasn’t related to sex, BPM data, antihypertensive therapy and CV comorbidity. Conclusions: We found the prognostic value of mean BP and its variability in patients younger than 75 year. The practicability of hospital BP monitoring in older patients needs further investigation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Hypertension
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/01.hjh.0001116144.75751.55
Primary Topic
Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING DATA AND MORTALITY ACCORDING TO THE HOSPITAL REGISTRY

В. М. Горбунов, Tatiana Ilina, М. М. Lukyanov, Yana Koshelyaevskaya
Journal of Hypertension
Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
article

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING DATA AND MORTALITY ACCORDING TO THE HOSPITAL REGISTRY

В. М. Горбунов, Tatiana Ilina, М. М. Lukyanov, Yana Koshelyaevskaya
article en

Abstract

Objective: Currently, the 24-h blood pressure monitoring (BPM) is often being performed in hospital conditions in patients with comorbidities, but prognostic value of these data is unclear. The aim of our study to evaluate the prognostic value of BPM results, obtained in hospitalized patients. Design and method: In a retro-prospective study based on the hospital registry of NMRC TPM, 358 patients who underwent an inpatient treatment in 2013-2015 were included into the final analysis. The inclusion criteria: permanent residence in Moscow, arterial hypertension (AH), valid BPM at the hospital stage (at least 15 measurements during the day and 3 at night), informed consent, absence of atrial fibrillation or flutter in the anamnesis. All participants were contacted by phone after 8-10 years of the reference hospitalization to establish their vital status. The statistical methods included ANOVA and survival analysis. Results: The mean age at the hospitalization stage (M±SD) was 72.9±12.0 (min - 25 years, max - 97 years), the percent of male patients - 31.0%; 77 patients died (mean age at the time of hospitalization 82.1±9.9, 20.8% males). Because of the differences in the age groups (<75 / =>75 years), mortality factors in the respective groups were analyzed separately. In the 18-74 years group (n=197), the overall mortality was jointly related with cardiovascular (CV) comorbidity (HR=3.25; 95% CI=1.14-9.22; p=0.027), the average real variability (HR=1.19; 95% CI=1.01-1.41; p=0.038) and the mean daily pulse BP (HR=1.05; 95% CI=1.02-1.09; p=0.002). There was no association with gender, age and antihypertensive therapy. In the group of patients older than 75 years (n=161), mortality was associated with age (HR=1.174; 95% CI=1.116-1.234; p<0.001) and wasn’t related to sex, BPM data, antihypertensive therapy and CV comorbidity. Conclusions: We found the prognostic value of mean BP and its variability in patients younger than 75 year. The practicability of hospital BP monitoring in older patients needs further investigation.

Journal of HypertensionVol. 43(Suppl 1)
National Research Center for Preventive Medicine (RU)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.