THE IMPACT OF PROPER METHODOLOGY ON THE ACCURACY OF OFFICE BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT: INSIGHTS FROM 2018 ESC/ESH GUIDELINES IN PROJECT CHARTER 2023

Objective: The accurate measurement of blood pressure (BP) is a cornerstone of hypertension (H) management. ESH/ESC Guidelines have established comprehensive guidelines to ensure the standardization and accuracy of BP measurement. CHARTER 70/2023 is an initiative of professional societies managing hypertension and patient organizations for better control of patients with hypertension in Slovakia This analysis focused on the proper methodology of office blood pressure (BP) measurement. Design and method: This project was conducted from April to June 2023 at 103 general physicians’ offices (GPO) in Slovakia. Results: We enrolled 3191 patients with H (52,5% women, mean age n 61,5 ± 8,2 years). On the visit 1 in GPO, 3 BP measurements were taken. The results of the first measurement (M1) were 142,9 (± 16,4) / 84,98 (±9,9) mm Hg, HR 73,96 (±9,8) bpm. Average of the 2nd and the 3rd measurement (M23) was 139,5 (±14,8) / 83,14 (±8,9) mm Hg, HR 72,99 (±9,1) bpm. Difference between M1 and M23 in was -3,4/-1,8 mm Hg, and -1,0 bpm, (p<0,0001). If there was only M1, 48% of patients would have BP <140/90 mm Hg, while evaluating average M23, the percentage of patients with BP lower than 140/90 mm Hg would be higher (55,5%) by 7,5%. Follow up on the visit 2 (V2): average BP on M1 136,16 (±12,8) /81,53 (±8,2) mm Hg, HR 72,70 (±8,9) bpm. Mean difference between M1 and M23 was -2,18/-1,34 mm Hg (p<0,0001), and -0,14 bpm (p<0,006). Percentage of patients with BP <140/90 mm Hg was higher. However, if there was only M1, 69,1% of patients would have BP <140/90 mm Hg, while assessing the average of M23, percentage of patients with BP lower than 140/90 mm Hg would be higher (74,3%). 5,2% of patients might have been classified and managed their disease differently. Conclusions: Proper methodology of BP measurement can result in more accurate diagnosis of hypertension. More patients (7,5% in Visit 1 and 5,2% in Visit 2) would be assessed as uncontrolled (BP > 140/90 mm Hg) if there was only one measurement vs three measurements.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Hypertension
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/01.hjh.0001116120.83528.4c
Primary Topic
Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

THE IMPACT OF PROPER METHODOLOGY ON THE ACCURACY OF OFFICE BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT: INSIGHTS FROM 2018 ESC/ESH GUIDELINES IN PROJECT CHARTER 2023

Adriana Simkova, Rastislav Šidlo, Anna Vachulová
Journal of Hypertension
Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
article

THE IMPACT OF PROPER METHODOLOGY ON THE ACCURACY OF OFFICE BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT: INSIGHTS FROM 2018 ESC/ESH GUIDELINES IN PROJECT CHARTER 2023

Adriana Simkova, Rastislav Šidlo, Anna Vachulová
article en

Abstract

Objective: The accurate measurement of blood pressure (BP) is a cornerstone of hypertension (H) management. ESH/ESC Guidelines have established comprehensive guidelines to ensure the standardization and accuracy of BP measurement. CHARTER 70/2023 is an initiative of professional societies managing hypertension and patient organizations for better control of patients with hypertension in Slovakia This analysis focused on the proper methodology of office blood pressure (BP) measurement. Design and method: This project was conducted from April to June 2023 at 103 general physicians’ offices (GPO) in Slovakia. Results: We enrolled 3191 patients with H (52,5% women, mean age n 61,5 ± 8,2 years). On the visit 1 in GPO, 3 BP measurements were taken. The results of the first measurement (M1) were 142,9 (± 16,4) / 84,98 (±9,9) mm Hg, HR 73,96 (±9,8) bpm. Average of the 2nd and the 3rd measurement (M23) was 139,5 (±14,8) / 83,14 (±8,9) mm Hg, HR 72,99 (±9,1) bpm. Difference between M1 and M23 in was -3,4/-1,8 mm Hg, and -1,0 bpm, (p<0,0001). If there was only M1, 48% of patients would have BP <140/90 mm Hg, while evaluating average M23, the percentage of patients with BP lower than 140/90 mm Hg would be higher (55,5%) by 7,5%. Follow up on the visit 2 (V2): average BP on M1 136,16 (±12,8) /81,53 (±8,2) mm Hg, HR 72,70 (±8,9) bpm. Mean difference between M1 and M23 was -2,18/-1,34 mm Hg (p<0,0001), and -0,14 bpm (p<0,006). Percentage of patients with BP <140/90 mm Hg was higher. However, if there was only M1, 69,1% of patients would have BP <140/90 mm Hg, while assessing the average of M23, percentage of patients with BP lower than 140/90 mm Hg would be higher (74,3%). 5,2% of patients might have been classified and managed their disease differently. Conclusions: Proper methodology of BP measurement can result in more accurate diagnosis of hypertension. More patients (7,5% in Visit 1 and 5,2% in Visit 2) would be assessed as uncontrolled (BP > 140/90 mm Hg) if there was only one measurement vs three measurements.

Journal of HypertensionVol. 43(Suppl 1)
National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases (SK), Bratislava University of Economics and Business (SK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.