AN AUDIT OF INPATIENT BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT FOCUSING ON ACCURATE TECHNIQUE

Objective: The accuracy of a blood pressure (BP) measurement depends on the quality of the measurement technique applied. Poor BP measurement technique is common in hospital settings and the resultant inaccurate readings risk inappropriate treatment changes, with implications for the immediate acute care setting and for longer term care. As there are no existing guidelines for the accurate measurement of BP in the inpatient setting, we sought to firstly generate a novel composite outcome measure and then assess the performance of a representative hospital by audit. Design and method: This was a comprehensive cross-sectional audit of selected admitted non-critical care wards (age care, acute surgical and haematology) in a 600-bed, tertiary public hospital. The method of BP measurement across three wards at St George Hospital was observed over three weeks. A ideal BP measurement was defined as one that included ten key variables determined by expert panel consensus. We detailed the observed BP measurements and their performance against our novel standard, as well as describing the characteristics of an average BP measurement. Results: A total of 278 BP measurements on 153 patients were observed in the audit period. Only 7% of BP measurements involved more than one reading, 77% used the correct cuff size, 23% had no talking during measurement, 65% had the cuff correctly positioned, and 85% had the limb at heart height. BP measurements were taken in a seated position 26%, legs uncrossed 82%, back supported 75% and arm bare 65% of the time. Conclusions: Prior to this study, there was no existing standard by which to measure the quality of BP measurement in admitted patients. We have piloted a composite method for inpatient BP measurement assessment derived by expert consensus and have found great variability in BP measurement technique in day to day care. These data provide a summation of standard practices in BP measurement at a representative hospital and a basis to develop studies to evaluate whether these variations correlate with patient outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Hypertension
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/01.hjh.0001116044.29145.c8
Primary Topic
Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AN AUDIT OF INPATIENT BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT FOCUSING ON ACCURATE TECHNIQUE

Brendan Smyth, George Mangos, Sergey Alexeev, Mark Brown et al.
Journal of Hypertension
Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
article

AN AUDIT OF INPATIENT BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT FOCUSING ON ACCURATE TECHNIQUE

Brendan Smyth, George Mangos, Sergey Alexeev, Mark Brown, Alexandra C. Gallagher, Meg Jardine
article en

Abstract

Objective: The accuracy of a blood pressure (BP) measurement depends on the quality of the measurement technique applied. Poor BP measurement technique is common in hospital settings and the resultant inaccurate readings risk inappropriate treatment changes, with implications for the immediate acute care setting and for longer term care. As there are no existing guidelines for the accurate measurement of BP in the inpatient setting, we sought to firstly generate a novel composite outcome measure and then assess the performance of a representative hospital by audit. Design and method: This was a comprehensive cross-sectional audit of selected admitted non-critical care wards (age care, acute surgical and haematology) in a 600-bed, tertiary public hospital. The method of BP measurement across three wards at St George Hospital was observed over three weeks. A ideal BP measurement was defined as one that included ten key variables determined by expert panel consensus. We detailed the observed BP measurements and their performance against our novel standard, as well as describing the characteristics of an average BP measurement. Results: A total of 278 BP measurements on 153 patients were observed in the audit period. Only 7% of BP measurements involved more than one reading, 77% used the correct cuff size, 23% had no talking during measurement, 65% had the cuff correctly positioned, and 85% had the limb at heart height. BP measurements were taken in a seated position 26%, legs uncrossed 82%, back supported 75% and arm bare 65% of the time. Conclusions: Prior to this study, there was no existing standard by which to measure the quality of BP measurement in admitted patients. We have piloted a composite method for inpatient BP measurement assessment derived by expert consensus and have found great variability in BP measurement technique in day to day care. These data provide a summation of standard practices in BP measurement at a representative hospital and a basis to develop studies to evaluate whether these variations correlate with patient outcomes.

Journal of HypertensionVol. 43(Suppl 1)
The University of Sydney (AU), Sutherland Hospital (AU), Concord Repatriation General Hospital (AU), St George Hospital (AU), National Health and Medical Research Council (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.