CAVI IS A SIGNIFICANT INDICATOR IN PRIMARY PREVENTION OF CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE

Objective: This study aimed to assess the impact of Cardio-Ankle Vascular Index (CAVI), an arterial stiffness parameter independent of blood pressure, on the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) through a sub-analysis of the CAVI-J (Prospective Multicenter Study to Evaluate Usefulness of Cardio-Ankle Vascular Index in Japan). Design and method: The study included 1,811 patients without a history of CV events, selected from an initial 2,932 patients who had at least one risk factor for CVD. Participants were followed for five years. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of cardiovascular events, including all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, hospitalization for heart failure, chronic coronary syndrome requiring percutaneous coronary intervention, new onset of peripheral artery disease, acute aortic dissection, and aortic aneurysm. The CAVI cut-off value was set at 8.65 based on ROC analysis. Results: Patients were divided into two groups based on their CAVI values: CAVI < 8.65 (978 patients) and CAVI > 8.65 (833 patients). Significant differences were observed between the two groups. Patients with CAVI > 8.65 were older (mean age 65.5 vs. 59.6 years), had a higher percentage of men (65.9% vs. 56.3%), and higher systolic blood pressure (137.4 vs. 132.6 mm Hg). During the follow-up period, 90 events were documented. Patients with CV events had significantly higher CAVI values (8.92 vs. 8.48, p < 0.001) compared to those without CV events. Multivariate Cox hazard ratio analysis indicated that a CAVI value > 8.65 was a significant predictor of future CV events (HR 1.64, 95% CI 1.04-2.59, p = 0.033). Furthermore, each one-point increase in CAVI was associated with a higher risk of CV events (HR 1.27, 95% CI 1.05-1.53, p = 0.014). The incorporation of CAVI into a model with known cardiovascular risks for predicting cardiovascular events increased the global chi-square value from 15.6 to 20.7 (P = 0.014) and yielded a net reclassification index of 0.313 (P = 0.004). Conclusions: Elevated CAVI values were significantly associated with an increased risk of CV events. Including CAVI in risk assessment models improved their predictive accuracy in patients without a history of CVD.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Hypertension
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/01.hjh.0001117916.07839.0f
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Diverse Scientific Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CAVI IS A SIGNIFICANT INDICATOR IN PRIMARY PREVENTION OF CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE

Shigeo Horinaka, Noriko Asahara, Masayuki Doi, Toru Miyoshi et al.
1 citations
Journal of Hypertension
Diverse Scientific Research Studies
2.82
article

CAVI IS A SIGNIFICANT INDICATOR IN PRIMARY PREVENTION OF CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE

Shigeo Horinaka, Noriko Asahara, Masayuki Doi, Toru Miyoshi, Shigeo Yamamura, Koji Hasegawa, Atsuhito Saiki, Hajime Orimo, Jitsuo Higaki, Kohji Shirai
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to assess the impact of Cardio-Ankle Vascular Index (CAVI), an arterial stiffness parameter independent of blood pressure, on the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) through a sub-analysis of the CAVI-J (Prospective Multicenter Study to Evaluate Usefulness of Cardio-Ankle Vascular Index in Japan). Design and method: The study included 1,811 patients without a history of CV events, selected from an initial 2,932 patients who had at least one risk factor for CVD. Participants were followed for five years. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of cardiovascular events, including all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, hospitalization for heart failure, chronic coronary syndrome requiring percutaneous coronary intervention, new onset of peripheral artery disease, acute aortic dissection, and aortic aneurysm. The CAVI cut-off value was set at 8.65 based on ROC analysis. Results: Patients were divided into two groups based on their CAVI values: CAVI < 8.65 (978 patients) and CAVI > 8.65 (833 patients). Significant differences were observed between the two groups. Patients with CAVI > 8.65 were older (mean age 65.5 vs. 59.6 years), had a higher percentage of men (65.9% vs. 56.3%), and higher systolic blood pressure (137.4 vs. 132.6 mm Hg). During the follow-up period, 90 events were documented. Patients with CV events had significantly higher CAVI values (8.92 vs. 8.48, p < 0.001) compared to those without CV events. Multivariate Cox hazard ratio analysis indicated that a CAVI value > 8.65 was a significant predictor of future CV events (HR 1.64, 95% CI 1.04-2.59, p = 0.033). Furthermore, each one-point increase in CAVI was associated with a higher risk of CV events (HR 1.27, 95% CI 1.05-1.53, p = 0.014). The incorporation of CAVI into a model with known cardiovascular risks for predicting cardiovascular events increased the global chi-square value from 15.6 to 20.7 (P = 0.014) and yielded a net reclassification index of 0.313 (P = 0.004). Conclusions: Elevated CAVI values were significantly associated with an increased risk of CV events. Including CAVI in risk assessment models improved their predictive accuracy in patients without a history of CVD.

Journal of HypertensionVol. 43(Suppl 1)
Toho University (JP), Okayama University (JP), Kyoto Medical Center (JP), Toho University Medical Center Sakura Hospital (JP), Saiseikai Matsuyama Hospital (JP), Kagawa Prefectural Central Hospital (JP), Josai International University (JP)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Diverse Scientific Research Studies
2.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.