CORRELATION BETWEEN BLOOD PRESSURE PARAMETERS AND CEREBRAL COMPLIANCE IN HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS

Objective: To evaluate the correlation between peripheral blood pressure measurements and intracranial pressure, considering the P2/P1 ratio as an indicator of intracranial pressure and Time to Peak (TTP) as the primary marker of cerebral compliance in hypertensive patients.Design and method: A cross-sectional study was conducted with 382 hypertensive patients (mean age 64 ± 12 years; 25.5% male). Systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were measured in the clinic and through home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM), along with the P2/P1 ratio and TTP. Scatter plots and sex-stratified analyses were performed to explore associations. Statistical methods included Pearson correlation and ROC curve analysis, considering the sensitivity and specificity of P2/P1 (>1.56) to detect hypertension based on HBPM (>130/80 mmHg). Results: Clinic SBP showed a positive correlation with P2/P1 (r = 0.116; 95% CI 0.016–0.215), while other variables, such as total, morning, and night HBPM, showed no significant correlation. The scatter plot between the four-day average SBP and the mean P2/P1 revealed a heterogeneous distribution without a consistent pattern. ROC analysis showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.493 for P2/P1 (>1.56), indicating low discriminatory capacity. Sensitivity and specificity were insufficient to identify hypertension through HBPM. Agreement between P2/P1 and HBPM was 32.5%, with a Kappa coefficient of -0.12 (95% CI -0.22; -0.02). TTP showed potential as a complementary marker, reflecting the time of curve accommodation and providing additional insights into cerebral compliance. Conclusions: The results demonstrated that the P2/P1 ratio is more related to intracranial pressure than to cerebral compliance, showing low correlation with peripheral blood pressure measurements, such as HBPM. Although clinic SBP exhibited a modest correlation with P2/P1, its clinical applicability is limited due to its low discriminatory capacity and lack of agreement with HBPM parameters. This study reinforces that TTP is a more appropriate marker for assessing cerebral compliance, and it should be integrated into future studies aimed at understanding the interactions between intracranial pressure, cerebral compliance, and arterial hypertension.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Hypertension
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/01.hjh.0001116180.09153.ce
Primary Topic
Healthcare Systems and Public Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CORRELATION BETWEEN BLOOD PRESSURE PARAMETERS AND CEREBRAL COMPLIANCE IN HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS

Sayuri Inuzuka, Ana Clara Domingos Caser, Ana Luíza Lima Sousa, Bárbara Marques et al.
Journal of Hypertension
Healthcare Systems and Public Health
article

CORRELATION BETWEEN BLOOD PRESSURE PARAMETERS AND CEREBRAL COMPLIANCE IN HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS

Sayuri Inuzuka, Ana Clara Domingos Caser, Ana Luíza Lima Sousa, Bárbara Marques, Maria Cristina Costa, Weimar Kunz Sebba Barroso, Matheus Martins da Costa, Gustavo Frigiere, Ana Flávia Figueiredo Paro Piai
article en

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the correlation between peripheral blood pressure measurements and intracranial pressure, considering the P2/P1 ratio as an indicator of intracranial pressure and Time to Peak (TTP) as the primary marker of cerebral compliance in hypertensive patients.Design and method: A cross-sectional study was conducted with 382 hypertensive patients (mean age 64 ± 12 years; 25.5% male). Systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were measured in the clinic and through home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM), along with the P2/P1 ratio and TTP. Scatter plots and sex-stratified analyses were performed to explore associations. Statistical methods included Pearson correlation and ROC curve analysis, considering the sensitivity and specificity of P2/P1 (>1.56) to detect hypertension based on HBPM (>130/80 mmHg). Results: Clinic SBP showed a positive correlation with P2/P1 (r = 0.116; 95% CI 0.016–0.215), while other variables, such as total, morning, and night HBPM, showed no significant correlation. The scatter plot between the four-day average SBP and the mean P2/P1 revealed a heterogeneous distribution without a consistent pattern. ROC analysis showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.493 for P2/P1 (>1.56), indicating low discriminatory capacity. Sensitivity and specificity were insufficient to identify hypertension through HBPM. Agreement between P2/P1 and HBPM was 32.5%, with a Kappa coefficient of -0.12 (95% CI -0.22; -0.02). TTP showed potential as a complementary marker, reflecting the time of curve accommodation and providing additional insights into cerebral compliance. Conclusions: The results demonstrated that the P2/P1 ratio is more related to intracranial pressure than to cerebral compliance, showing low correlation with peripheral blood pressure measurements, such as HBPM. Although clinic SBP exhibited a modest correlation with P2/P1, its clinical applicability is limited due to its low discriminatory capacity and lack of agreement with HBPM parameters. This study reinforces that TTP is a more appropriate marker for assessing cerebral compliance, and it should be integrated into future studies aimed at understanding the interactions between intracranial pressure, cerebral compliance, and arterial hypertension.

Journal of HypertensionVol. 43(Suppl 1)
Universidade de São Paulo (BR), Universidade Federal de Goiás (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Healthcare Systems and Public Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.