GENDER DIFFERENCES IN THE ASSESSMENT OF CARDIOVASCULAR RISK, AND CONTROL OF BLOOD PRESSURE AND LDL-CHOLESTEROL: A SUBANALYSIS OF THE SNAPSHOT STUDY IN EUROPE

Objective: This pre-specified subgroup analysis aims to assess differences in cardiovascular (CV) risk, blood pressure (BP) and LDL-C control between genders in hypertensive patients. Design and method: SNAPSHOT is a cross-sectional, epidemiological, multicentre study conducted in 9443 patients with hypertension from six European countries (Bulgaria, Croatia, Georgia, Romania, Serbia, and Spain). Investigators estimated BP and LDL-C control, and CV risk according to their clinical practice. Estimated CV risk categories were compared to the calculated CV risk based on SCORE2&2-OP. Results: 5281 women and 3996 men were analyzed. Women tended to be older than men (66.9±10.0 years vs. 64.3±11.0 years), while men were more likely to be smokers (21.5% vs. 13.9%) and overweight/obese (BMI 29.6±7.3 kg/m2 vs. 29.2±6.5 kg/m2), p<0.001 for all. Two or more risk factors (age>65years, BMI>30 kg/m2, smoking) were reported in 30.4% of women and in 29.3% of men (in addition to the male gender risk factor). Presence of dyslipidemia and type 2 diabetes were higher in men than women (82.7% vs. 81.1%, p<0.05 and 36.4% vs. 30.8%, p<0.001). Mean SBD/DBP were higher in men than women (139.9±17.0/83.3±11.2 mmHg vs. 138.8±17.4/81.5±10.4 mmHg, p<0.001). According to guidelines, BP was controlled in more women than men (26.7% vs. 21.6%, p<0.001). Mean LDL-C was higher in women than men (123.8±45.9 mg/dL vs. 114.3±46.0 mg/dL, p<0.001). According to guidelines, LDL-C was controlled in less women than men (6.0% vs. 9.9%, p<0.001). Estimated CV risk categories, compared to calculated CV risk, were: very high (18.1% women, 30.1% men vs. 84.7%, 88.4%); high (31.3%, 33.8% vs. 13.5%, 11.1%); and low-to-moderate (50.6%, 36.0% vs. 1.8%, 0.5%). Compared to guidelines, CV risk was more frequently underestimated by investigators in women (76.5%) than in men (65.7%), whereas it was accurately categorized less frequently in women (22.1%) than in men (32.7%) (both p<0.001, Figure).Conclusions: This subanalysis showed that investigators underestimated CV risk more often in women than in men. Women had lower LDL-C control, but better BP control compared to men. When developing and implementing interventions to improve BP control in the European population, we believe gender differences must be considered to improve effectiveness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Hypertension
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/01.hjh.0001115816.12870.c9
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Sex and Gender in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.88
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

GENDER DIFFERENCES IN THE ASSESSMENT OF CARDIOVASCULAR RISK, AND CONTROL OF BLOOD PRESSURE AND LDL-CHOLESTEROL: A SUBANALYSIS OF THE SNAPSHOT STUDY IN EUROPE

Ivan Pećin, Dragoş Vinereanu, Anastase Dzudié, Julien Magné et al.
1 citations
Journal of Hypertension
Sex and Gender in Healthcare
1.88
article

GENDER DIFFERENCES IN THE ASSESSMENT OF CARDIOVASCULAR RISK, AND CONTROL OF BLOOD PRESSURE AND LDL-CHOLESTEROL: A SUBANALYSIS OF THE SNAPSHOT STUDY IN EUROPE

Ivan Pećin, Dragoş Vinereanu, Anastase Dzudié, Julien Magné, José M. Prieto, Arman Postadzhiyan, Branislava Ivanović, Miguel Camafort, Tamaz Shaburishvili
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Objective: This pre-specified subgroup analysis aims to assess differences in cardiovascular (CV) risk, blood pressure (BP) and LDL-C control between genders in hypertensive patients. Design and method: SNAPSHOT is a cross-sectional, epidemiological, multicentre study conducted in 9443 patients with hypertension from six European countries (Bulgaria, Croatia, Georgia, Romania, Serbia, and Spain). Investigators estimated BP and LDL-C control, and CV risk according to their clinical practice. Estimated CV risk categories were compared to the calculated CV risk based on SCORE2&2-OP. Results: 5281 women and 3996 men were analyzed. Women tended to be older than men (66.9±10.0 years vs. 64.3±11.0 years), while men were more likely to be smokers (21.5% vs. 13.9%) and overweight/obese (BMI 29.6±7.3 kg/m2 vs. 29.2±6.5 kg/m2), p<0.001 for all. Two or more risk factors (age>65years, BMI>30 kg/m2, smoking) were reported in 30.4% of women and in 29.3% of men (in addition to the male gender risk factor). Presence of dyslipidemia and type 2 diabetes were higher in men than women (82.7% vs. 81.1%, p<0.05 and 36.4% vs. 30.8%, p<0.001). Mean SBD/DBP were higher in men than women (139.9±17.0/83.3±11.2 mmHg vs. 138.8±17.4/81.5±10.4 mmHg, p<0.001). According to guidelines, BP was controlled in more women than men (26.7% vs. 21.6%, p<0.001). Mean LDL-C was higher in women than men (123.8±45.9 mg/dL vs. 114.3±46.0 mg/dL, p<0.001). According to guidelines, LDL-C was controlled in less women than men (6.0% vs. 9.9%, p<0.001). Estimated CV risk categories, compared to calculated CV risk, were: very high (18.1% women, 30.1% men vs. 84.7%, 88.4%); high (31.3%, 33.8% vs. 13.5%, 11.1%); and low-to-moderate (50.6%, 36.0% vs. 1.8%, 0.5%). Compared to guidelines, CV risk was more frequently underestimated by investigators in women (76.5%) than in men (65.7%), whereas it was accurately categorized less frequently in women (22.1%) than in men (32.7%) (both p<0.001, Figure).Conclusions: This subanalysis showed that investigators underestimated CV risk more often in women than in men. Women had lower LDL-C control, but better BP control compared to men. When developing and implementing interventions to improve BP control in the European population, we believe gender differences must be considered to improve effectiveness.

Journal of HypertensionVol. 43(Suppl 1)
University Hospital Centre Zagreb (HR), Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy (RO), University of Douala (CM), Ilia State University (GE), Hospital Universitario La Paz (ES), Medical University of Sofia (BG), Univerzitetski Klinički Centar Srbije (RS), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Limoges (FR), University of Georgia (GE), Université de Limoges (FR), Universitat de Barcelona (ES)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Sex and Gender in Healthcare
1.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.