COMPARISON ABOUT SPECIAL SITUATIONS BETWEEN 2021 NATIONAL HYPERTENSION GUIDELINES AND 2023 EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF HYPERTENSION GUIDELINES

Objective: To compare the special situations addressed in two guidelines for the management of hypertension: the European Society of Hypertension (ESH, 2023) and our national Society of Family and Community Medicine (2021). Design and method: Sixteen members of the hypertension section of our national society of family doctors reviewed both guidelines. Afterwards, in different meetings, updates to were discussed. Here we present some of the major differences in special situations. Results: Both guidelines provide comprehensive recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of hypertension but may differ in their approach to specific populations and clinical scenarios. The ESH guidelines emphasize the importance of individualized treatment strategies, especially in vulnerable groups such as the elderly, patients with comorbidities, and those with resistant hypertension. On the other hand, 2021 national guidelines focus on integrating hypertension management in primary care settings, highlighting the role of lifestyle modifications and patient education. It is worth highlighting the presence of the management of hypertension in special situations common in primary care, a section much less developed in the European guidelines where the information is often fragmented between the different sections and where there is no information on certain exceptionalities such as the patient with HIV, urinary incontinence or mental health, among others that are present in our national guidelines. Transsexuality is only present in the European guidelines. Conclusions: Both guidelines offer an opportunity to think about a new model of healthcare where the patient is empowered to monitor and manage their BP aid using new technologies. Comparing both publications, we believe that the European guidelines provide further knowledge to our national guidelines, but those add some extra tools and detailed sections for handling Hypertension in a variety of primary care settings applicable to our national context.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Hypertension
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/01.hjh.0001117284.22353.30
Primary Topic
Clinical practice guidelines implementation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

COMPARISON ABOUT SPECIAL SITUATIONS BETWEEN 2021 NATIONAL HYPERTENSION GUIDELINES AND 2023 EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF HYPERTENSION GUIDELINES

Núria Soldevila-Bacardit, Ernest Vinyoles, Mència Benítez, Gabriel Coll de Tuero et al.
Journal of Hypertension
Clinical practice guidelines implementation
article

COMPARISON ABOUT SPECIAL SITUATIONS BETWEEN 2021 NATIONAL HYPERTENSION GUIDELINES AND 2023 EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF HYPERTENSION GUIDELINES

Núria Soldevila-Bacardit, Ernest Vinyoles, Mència Benítez, Gabriel Coll de Tuero, Joan Torras-Borrell, Mireia Gibrat-Pineda, Oriol Rebagliato-Nadal, Laura Camps-Vila, Jordi Rosinach-Bonet, Melania Priego-Artero, Carles Albaladejo-Blanco, Maria Antònia Vila-Coll, Mariano De La Figuera-Von Wichman, Maria Cecilia-Salgueiro, Beatriz Arnal-López, Mar Serrta-Costa
article en

Abstract

Objective: To compare the special situations addressed in two guidelines for the management of hypertension: the European Society of Hypertension (ESH, 2023) and our national Society of Family and Community Medicine (2021). Design and method: Sixteen members of the hypertension section of our national society of family doctors reviewed both guidelines. Afterwards, in different meetings, updates to were discussed. Here we present some of the major differences in special situations. Results: Both guidelines provide comprehensive recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of hypertension but may differ in their approach to specific populations and clinical scenarios. The ESH guidelines emphasize the importance of individualized treatment strategies, especially in vulnerable groups such as the elderly, patients with comorbidities, and those with resistant hypertension. On the other hand, 2021 national guidelines focus on integrating hypertension management in primary care settings, highlighting the role of lifestyle modifications and patient education. It is worth highlighting the presence of the management of hypertension in special situations common in primary care, a section much less developed in the European guidelines where the information is often fragmented between the different sections and where there is no information on certain exceptionalities such as the patient with HIV, urinary incontinence or mental health, among others that are present in our national guidelines. Transsexuality is only present in the European guidelines. Conclusions: Both guidelines offer an opportunity to think about a new model of healthcare where the patient is empowered to monitor and manage their BP aid using new technologies. Comparing both publications, we believe that the European guidelines provide further knowledge to our national guidelines, but those add some extra tools and detailed sections for handling Hypertension in a variety of primary care settings applicable to our national context.

Journal of HypertensionVol. 43(Suppl 1)
Universitat de Lleida (ES), Clínica Girona (ES), Consorci d’Atenció Primària de Salut Barcelona Esquerra (ES), Consorci Sanitari de Terrassa (ES), Catalan Society of Family and Community Medicine (ES), Institut Català de la Salut (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Clinical practice guidelines implementation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.