Improving Critical Thinking Skills Through Claim-evidence-reason Framework

Aims: This study explored the potential of the Claim, Evidence, Reasoning (CER) framework in enhancing students' critical thinking skills. It examined the perceived satisfaction levels of students regarding the administration of CER tests, the students’ level of critical thinking, and their relationship. The results became the basis of crafting a policy on the proper administration of CER was proposed. Study Design: The study utilized descriptive-developmental research design Place and Duration of Study: The study was conducted at the private Catholic basic institution in Ozamiz City, Philippines which made use of the CER Framework for years already. The survey was done in the months of October to December 2024. Methodology: A total of 605 Grades 8, 9, 10, and 12 students, selected through stratified random sampling, were the respondents in the study. The study utilized survey questionnaire focused in the areas of CER administration and level of students’ critical thinking. The instrument underwent validity and reliability tests. Data were gathered through asking respondents to answer the survey. Results: Results revealed that students were satisfied with the CER framework's administration across all components: time allotment (M=2.89), alignment to lesson objectives (M=3.13), scoring rubric and criteria (M=3.24), and preparation and familiarization (M=3.02). Meanwhile, students also demonstrated high levels of critical thinking: analysis (M=3.30), interpretation (M=3.14), inference (M=3.15), explanation (M=3.15) and self-regulation (M=3.13). Notably, significant positive correlations were identified between satisfaction levels and critical thinking component (p<.001) indicating strong statistical significance. From these, a policy was proposed to strengthen CER framework implementation, focusing on time management, curriculum alignment, rubric development, and improved assessment practices. Conclusion: The study concluded that the CER framework is an effective tool for improving critical thinking. Based on the findings, it was recommended to implement the proposed policy and examine its effectiveness to students’ critical thinking.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies
Published
2025-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2025/v51i61988
Primary Topic
Education and Critical Thinking Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Improving Critical Thinking Skills Through Claim-evidence-reason Framework

Stephanie Ann J. Daraman, Juelyn A. Ecdang, Arcelle D. Senit, Trisha Lean V. Malintad et al.
Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies
Education and Critical Thinking Development
article

Improving Critical Thinking Skills Through Claim-evidence-reason Framework

Stephanie Ann J. Daraman, Juelyn A. Ecdang, Arcelle D. Senit, Trisha Lean V. Malintad, Ricah Jane Archua, Jackjun G. Caupayan
article en

Abstract

Aims: This study explored the potential of the Claim, Evidence, Reasoning (CER) framework in enhancing students' critical thinking skills. It examined the perceived satisfaction levels of students regarding the administration of CER tests, the students’ level of critical thinking, and their relationship. The results became the basis of crafting a policy on the proper administration of CER was proposed. Study Design: The study utilized descriptive-developmental research design Place and Duration of Study: The study was conducted at the private Catholic basic institution in Ozamiz City, Philippines which made use of the CER Framework for years already. The survey was done in the months of October to December 2024. Methodology: A total of 605 Grades 8, 9, 10, and 12 students, selected through stratified random sampling, were the respondents in the study. The study utilized survey questionnaire focused in the areas of CER administration and level of students’ critical thinking. The instrument underwent validity and reliability tests. Data were gathered through asking respondents to answer the survey. Results: Results revealed that students were satisfied with the CER framework's administration across all components: time allotment (M=2.89), alignment to lesson objectives (M=3.13), scoring rubric and criteria (M=3.24), and preparation and familiarization (M=3.02). Meanwhile, students also demonstrated high levels of critical thinking: analysis (M=3.30), interpretation (M=3.14), inference (M=3.15), explanation (M=3.15) and self-regulation (M=3.13). Notably, significant positive correlations were identified between satisfaction levels and critical thinking component (p<.001) indicating strong statistical significance. From these, a policy was proposed to strengthen CER framework implementation, focusing on time management, curriculum alignment, rubric development, and improved assessment practices. Conclusion: The study concluded that the CER framework is an effective tool for improving critical thinking. Based on the findings, it was recommended to implement the proposed policy and examine its effectiveness to students’ critical thinking.

Asian Journal of Education and Social StudiesVol. 51(6)
La Salle University (PH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Education and Critical Thinking Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.