Using Eye Movements From a “Read‐Only” Task to Predict Text Comprehension

ABSTRACT Recent research on the use of eye movements to predict performance on reading comprehension tasks suggests that while eye movements may be used to measure comprehension, the relationship between eye‐movement behavior and comprehension is influenced by differences in task demands between comprehension measures. In this study, we examined the usefulness of eye movements collected during reading with no additional task demands (a “read‐only” condition) to predict comprehension ability as measured by a recall task. We collected eye‐movement behavior from adult native speakers of English ( N = 62, 46 females, mean age 26 years) while they read nine passages of fictional text in two conditions: a read‐only condition with no additional task, and a recall condition where participants were asked to recall the story after reading it. We ran Bayesian logistic regression models to predict performance on the recall tasks from standard eye‐tracking measures collected during the two reading conditions (read‐only and recall). Eye‐tracking measures collected in the read‐only and recall conditions were both useful in predicting reading comprehension as measured by recall scores. Additionally, the relationship between eye‐movement behavior and recall performance was similar for both reading conditions. In both cases, a combination of early and late measures was the best predictors of performance on the recall task. These findings demonstrate the usefulness of eye movements collected during reading with no additional task as predictors of reading comprehension ability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Reading Research Quarterly
Published
2025-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.70023
Primary Topic
Reading and Literacy Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using Eye Movements From a “Read‐Only” Task to Predict Text Comprehension

Genevieve M. McArthur, Diane Caroline Mézière, Titus von der Malsburg, Erik D. Reichle et al.
Reading Research Quarterly
Reading and Literacy Development
article

Using Eye Movements From a “Read‐Only” Task to Predict Text Comprehension

Genevieve M. McArthur, Diane Caroline Mézière, Titus von der Malsburg, Erik D. Reichle, Lili Yu
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Recent research on the use of eye movements to predict performance on reading comprehension tasks suggests that while eye movements may be used to measure comprehension, the relationship between eye‐movement behavior and comprehension is influenced by differences in task demands between comprehension measures. In this study, we examined the usefulness of eye movements collected during reading with no additional task demands (a “read‐only” condition) to predict comprehension ability as measured by a recall task. We collected eye‐movement behavior from adult native speakers of English ( N = 62, 46 females, mean age 26 years) while they read nine passages of fictional text in two conditions: a read‐only condition with no additional task, and a recall condition where participants were asked to recall the story after reading it. We ran Bayesian logistic regression models to predict performance on the recall tasks from standard eye‐tracking measures collected during the two reading conditions (read‐only and recall). Eye‐tracking measures collected in the read‐only and recall conditions were both useful in predicting reading comprehension as measured by recall scores. Additionally, the relationship between eye‐movement behavior and recall performance was similar for both reading conditions. In both cases, a combination of early and late measures was the best predictors of performance on the recall task. These findings demonstrate the usefulness of eye movements collected during reading with no additional task as predictors of reading comprehension ability.

Reading Research QuarterlyVol. 60(3)
University of Stuttgart (DE), University of Turku (FI), Australian Catholic University (AU), Macquarie University (AU)
Macquarie University, Turun Yliopisto, Australian Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Reading and Literacy Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.