Formal Multi-Agent AI System Architecture for Regulated Insurers

This paper proposes a formal multi-agent architecture for implementing enterprise AI in regulated insurance firms,integrating economic theory with institutional design. The framework synthesises three core theoretical perspectives:Arrow’s risk pooling theory to formalise risk transformation under uncertainty, Nash equilibrium to model strategicinteractions between decision agents, and Principal-Agent theory to address incentive alignment under informationasymmetry. The insurer is modelled as a constrained optimisation entity operating under solvency, legal, ESG, andoperational boundaries, with specific focus on the regulatory contexts of Austria and Germany. The architecturedecomposes the firm into multiple specialised agents—each representing distinct functional domains such as capitalmanagement, underwriting, claims processing, compliance, fraud detection, and client interaction. Human-in-theloop agents are integrated through a tiered access control system, ensuring differentiated data visibility and decisioninfluence based on user roles. An orchestrator agent supervises inter-agent coordination, enforcing regulatory admissibility and institutional coherence under frameworks such as Solvency II, the AI Act, and the Insurance DistributionDirective. Protocol integration is based on asynchronous execution and dual-layer communication infrastructures,specifically the Model Context Protocol (MCP) and Agent-to-Agent (A2A) messaging. This structure enables thesystematic design of compliant, auditable multi-agent systems aligned with the institutional logic of financial firmsin Austria and Germany.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Next-Generation Research 5 0
Published
2025-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.70792/jngr5.0.v1i4.123
Primary Topic
Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Formal Multi-Agent AI System Architecture for Regulated Insurers

Walter Kurz
Journal of Next-Generation Research 5 0
Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
article

Formal Multi-Agent AI System Architecture for Regulated Insurers

Walter Kurz
article en

Abstract

This paper proposes a formal multi-agent architecture for implementing enterprise AI in regulated insurance firms,integrating economic theory with institutional design. The framework synthesises three core theoretical perspectives:Arrow’s risk pooling theory to formalise risk transformation under uncertainty, Nash equilibrium to model strategicinteractions between decision agents, and Principal-Agent theory to address incentive alignment under informationasymmetry. The insurer is modelled as a constrained optimisation entity operating under solvency, legal, ESG, andoperational boundaries, with specific focus on the regulatory contexts of Austria and Germany. The architecturedecomposes the firm into multiple specialised agents—each representing distinct functional domains such as capitalmanagement, underwriting, claims processing, compliance, fraud detection, and client interaction. Human-in-theloop agents are integrated through a tiered access control system, ensuring differentiated data visibility and decisioninfluence based on user roles. An orchestrator agent supervises inter-agent coordination, enforcing regulatory admissibility and institutional coherence under frameworks such as Solvency II, the AI Act, and the Insurance DistributionDirective. Protocol integration is based on asynchronous execution and dual-layer communication infrastructures,specifically the Model Context Protocol (MCP) and Agent-to-Agent (A2A) messaging. This structure enables thesystematic design of compliant, auditable multi-agent systems aligned with the institutional logic of financial firmsin Austria and Germany.

Journal of Next-Generation Research 5 0
Signum Computer (Germany) (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.