Preserving the Past in the Plough Zone Together: Hobby metal detecting in Innlandet County as a case of good practice within the Norwegian legal framework

This article presents and discusses the practice of Norwegian metal-detecting from the perspective of Innlandet County. The authors perceive hobby metal-detecting in Norway as an essentially good thing even with its downsides, and believe that a collaborative approach is the best way to preserve the past in the plough zone. The case study of the Innlandet practice is based on first-hand experiences of the Innlandet archaeologists. We present how the Innlandet practice has emerged, how archaeologists communicate with detectorists, and how the archaeological context of finds in the plough zone is understood. In our opinion, general in situ protection in the plough zone is the 'worst practice' within the Norwegian legal framework.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Internet Archaeology
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.11141/ia.68.2
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Indigenous Studies and Ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Preserving the Past in the Plough Zone Together: Hobby metal detecting in Innlandet County as a case of good practice within the Norwegian legal framework

Lars Pilø, Caroline Fredriksen, Kjetil Skare, May-Tove Smiseth et al.
1 citations
Internet Archaeology
Indigenous Studies and Ecology
2.82
article

Preserving the Past in the Plough Zone Together: Hobby metal detecting in Innlandet County as a case of good practice within the Norwegian legal framework

Lars Pilø, Caroline Fredriksen, Kjetil Skare, May-Tove Smiseth, Anne Engesveen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This article presents and discusses the practice of Norwegian metal-detecting from the perspective of Innlandet County. The authors perceive hobby metal-detecting in Norway as an essentially good thing even with its downsides, and believe that a collaborative approach is the best way to preserve the past in the plough zone. The case study of the Innlandet practice is based on first-hand experiences of the Innlandet archaeologists. We present how the Innlandet practice has emerged, how archaeologists communicate with detectorists, and how the archaeological context of finds in the plough zone is understood. In our opinion, general in situ protection in the plough zone is the 'worst practice' within the Norwegian legal framework.

Internet Archaeology(68)
Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Indigenous Studies and Ecology
2.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Preserving the Past in the Plough Zone Together: Hobby metal detecting in Innlandet County as a case of good practice within the Norwegian legal framework — Lars Pilø, Caroline Fredriksen, et al. · Internet Archaeology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS