COGNITIVE BIASES AND THEIR IMPACT ON ECONOMIC DECISIONS

In the modern business environment, marked by rapid digital transformation, financial volatility, and geopolitical uncertainties, economic decision-making has grown increasingly complex. Understanding the psychological foundations of human choices is crucial, particularly within behavioral economics, which challenges conventional notions of rational decision-making. Cognitive biases – systematic deviations in judgment and perception – prompt individuals to rely on mental shortcuts when assessing alternatives or making choices. Rooted in human cognition, these biases influence economic agents at both individual and organizational levels, shaping strategic planning, pricing strategies, investment choices, and resource allocation. The significance of studying cognitive biases stems from their widespread impact on economic outcomes, particularly in high-stakes scenarios such as crisis management, financial forecasting, and negotiations, where uncertainty and risk are inherent. This article investigates the nature of cognitive biases and their effects on economic decision-making in contemporary business settings. It examines key types of biases, including the availability heuristic, anchoring effect, confirmation bias, overconfidence, loss aversion, and framing effect, and explores the mechanisms through which these biases influence the behavior of economic actors. The discussion highlights how such biases can result in misjudgments, risk aversion, or adherence to initial assumptions despite conflicting evidence, potentially impeding innovation and adaptability. Additionally, the article emphasizes the need to incorporate psychological awareness into management practices, underscoring the role of critical thinking, digital tools, and data-driven decision-making models in mitigating the impact of cognitive biases. By addressing these issues, the study highlights the importance of considering psychological factors in developing robust economic strategies, providing insights into how businesses can address non-rational decision-making to enhance resilience and efficiency. The exploration of these topics contributes to the evolving discourse in behavioral economics and management sciences, opening avenues for further research into optimizing decision-making processes in complex economic systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Business Navigator
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32782/business-navigator.80-23
Primary Topic
Economic theories and models
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

COGNITIVE BIASES AND THEIR IMPACT ON ECONOMIC DECISIONS

Вікторія Кифяк, Andrii Bilak
Business Navigator
Economic theories and models
article

COGNITIVE BIASES AND THEIR IMPACT ON ECONOMIC DECISIONS

Вікторія Кифяк, Andrii Bilak
article en

Abstract

In the modern business environment, marked by rapid digital transformation, financial volatility, and geopolitical uncertainties, economic decision-making has grown increasingly complex. Understanding the psychological foundations of human choices is crucial, particularly within behavioral economics, which challenges conventional notions of rational decision-making. Cognitive biases – systematic deviations in judgment and perception – prompt individuals to rely on mental shortcuts when assessing alternatives or making choices. Rooted in human cognition, these biases influence economic agents at both individual and organizational levels, shaping strategic planning, pricing strategies, investment choices, and resource allocation. The significance of studying cognitive biases stems from their widespread impact on economic outcomes, particularly in high-stakes scenarios such as crisis management, financial forecasting, and negotiations, where uncertainty and risk are inherent. This article investigates the nature of cognitive biases and their effects on economic decision-making in contemporary business settings. It examines key types of biases, including the availability heuristic, anchoring effect, confirmation bias, overconfidence, loss aversion, and framing effect, and explores the mechanisms through which these biases influence the behavior of economic actors. The discussion highlights how such biases can result in misjudgments, risk aversion, or adherence to initial assumptions despite conflicting evidence, potentially impeding innovation and adaptability. Additionally, the article emphasizes the need to incorporate psychological awareness into management practices, underscoring the role of critical thinking, digital tools, and data-driven decision-making models in mitigating the impact of cognitive biases. By addressing these issues, the study highlights the importance of considering psychological factors in developing robust economic strategies, providing insights into how businesses can address non-rational decision-making to enhance resilience and efficiency. The exploration of these topics contributes to the evolving discourse in behavioral economics and management sciences, opening avenues for further research into optimizing decision-making processes in complex economic systems.

Business Navigator(3(80))
Yuriy Fedkovych Chernivtsi National University (UA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Economic theories and models
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.