Can ECH Wave Scattering Explain the Unaccounted Electron Loss During the 17 March 2013 Geomagnetic Storm?

Abstract The interaction of electrons with electrostatic electron cyclotron harmonic (ECH) waves in the Earth's magnetosphere can lead to the scattering of plasma sheet electrons into the atmospheric loss cone, affecting the evolution of electron phase space density. Previous studies have shown that ECH waves are capable of efficiently scattering electrons with energies ranging from several hundred electronvolts to a few kiloelectronvolts, depending on the wave properties. At the same time, recent results indicate that ring current models overestimate the electron flux of 10–50 keV during storm time, implying the existence of a missing nightside loss process. Since the scattering rates due to wave‐particle interactions with ECH waves, which are currently not incorporated in quasi‐linear studies of ring current dynamics, increase with increasing geomagnetic activity, ECH waves are a potential candidate to explain part of the missing loss process. In this study, we evaluate the efficiency of ECH wave scattering for a wave event that occurred during the geomagnetic storm on 17 March 2013, by calculating quasi‐linear bounce‐averaged scattering rates. The resulting lifetimes are incorporated into simulations conducted using the 4‐dimensional Versatile Electron Radiation Belt (VERB‐4D) code. The results demonstrate that ECH waves during this event can scatter electrons over a wide range of energies up to several keV, but the resulting lifetimes are too long to significantly alter the resulting pitch angle distribution. Consequently, we find no evidence in support of the hypothesis that direct scattering due to ECH waves contributes to the missing loss process.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2024ja033516
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.31

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can ECH Wave Scattering Explain the Unaccounted Electron Loss During the 17 March 2013 Geomagnetic Storm?

Binbin Ni, Dedong Wang, K. Stoll, Xing Cao et al.
2 citations
Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics
Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
2.31
article

Can ECH Wave Scattering Explain the Unaccounted Electron Loss During the 17 March 2013 Geomagnetic Storm?

Binbin Ni, Dedong Wang, K. Stoll, Xing Cao, Yuri Shprits, Bernhard Haas, Leonie Pick
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract The interaction of electrons with electrostatic electron cyclotron harmonic (ECH) waves in the Earth's magnetosphere can lead to the scattering of plasma sheet electrons into the atmospheric loss cone, affecting the evolution of electron phase space density. Previous studies have shown that ECH waves are capable of efficiently scattering electrons with energies ranging from several hundred electronvolts to a few kiloelectronvolts, depending on the wave properties. At the same time, recent results indicate that ring current models overestimate the electron flux of 10–50 keV during storm time, implying the existence of a missing nightside loss process. Since the scattering rates due to wave‐particle interactions with ECH waves, which are currently not incorporated in quasi‐linear studies of ring current dynamics, increase with increasing geomagnetic activity, ECH waves are a potential candidate to explain part of the missing loss process. In this study, we evaluate the efficiency of ECH wave scattering for a wave event that occurred during the geomagnetic storm on 17 March 2013, by calculating quasi‐linear bounce‐averaged scattering rates. The resulting lifetimes are incorporated into simulations conducted using the 4‐dimensional Versatile Electron Radiation Belt (VERB‐4D) code. The results demonstrate that ECH waves during this event can scatter electrons over a wide range of energies up to several keV, but the resulting lifetimes are too long to significantly alter the resulting pitch angle distribution. Consequently, we find no evidence in support of the hypothesis that direct scattering due to ECH waves contributes to the missing loss process.

Journal of Geophysical Research Space PhysicsVol. 130(5)
Planetary Science Institute (US), University of California, Los Angeles (US), University of Potsdam (DE), Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e. V. (DLR) (DE), Wuhan University (CN), GFZ Helmholtz Centre for Geosciences (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
2.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.