Emission Reduction Effect of Carbon Trading Policy Based on Multi-Period DID and Synergy Effect

As a cornerstone of China’s climate governance framework, the carbon trading pilot policy provides critical insights into achieving Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly SDG 13 (Climate Action) which emphasizes carbon emission reduction. This paper used provincial panel data from 2002 to 2021 in China, it specifies a multi-period Difference-in-Differences (DID) model to evaluate the effects of carbon trading policies on carbon reduction. The results indicate the following: First, carbon trading policies generally have significant effects on carbon emission reductions in pilot regions compared to non-pilot regions. Second, from the perspective of operation mechanisms, carbon trading policy realizes emission reductions mainly through market-oriented incentives and the optimization of energy consumption structures, while the effects of cost pressures and technological innovation are not significant. Third, under the synergistic mechanism, the greater the market-oriented effects and cost pressure generated by carbon trading, the better the effect of optimizing the energy consumption on reducing carbon emissions. Fourth, the regional heterogeneity test shows that the differences in regional green development attention and green financial development level also make the effects of carbon trading policies heterogeneous, where the emission reduction effect is better in regions with higher attention to green development and green financial development levels. The primary contributions of this study lie in its systematic examination of the synergistic effects among market-oriented incentives, technological innovation dynamics, cost pressures, and energy structure optimization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2025-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su17114764
Primary Topic
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Emission Reduction Effect of Carbon Trading Policy Based on Multi-Period DID and Synergy Effect

Lijing Xu, Yiduo Chen, Ping Li, Xuesong Gu
Sustainability
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
article

Emission Reduction Effect of Carbon Trading Policy Based on Multi-Period DID and Synergy Effect

Lijing Xu, Yiduo Chen, Ping Li, Xuesong Gu
article en

Abstract

As a cornerstone of China’s climate governance framework, the carbon trading pilot policy provides critical insights into achieving Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly SDG 13 (Climate Action) which emphasizes carbon emission reduction. This paper used provincial panel data from 2002 to 2021 in China, it specifies a multi-period Difference-in-Differences (DID) model to evaluate the effects of carbon trading policies on carbon reduction. The results indicate the following: First, carbon trading policies generally have significant effects on carbon emission reductions in pilot regions compared to non-pilot regions. Second, from the perspective of operation mechanisms, carbon trading policy realizes emission reductions mainly through market-oriented incentives and the optimization of energy consumption structures, while the effects of cost pressures and technological innovation are not significant. Third, under the synergistic mechanism, the greater the market-oriented effects and cost pressure generated by carbon trading, the better the effect of optimizing the energy consumption on reducing carbon emissions. Fourth, the regional heterogeneity test shows that the differences in regional green development attention and green financial development level also make the effects of carbon trading policies heterogeneous, where the emission reduction effect is better in regions with higher attention to green development and green financial development levels. The primary contributions of this study lie in its systematic examination of the synergistic effects among market-oriented incentives, technological innovation dynamics, cost pressures, and energy structure optimization.

SustainabilityVol. 17(11)
Fudan University (CN), Beijing Forestry University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.